No summary available.
Showing 1–20 of 36 items
No summary available.
About the classification of colours.
Suggests alterations to Poulton's table of classification of animal colouration.
Simplification of colour uses for Poulton's book.
About the inclusion of a simpler table in Poulton's book.
Thanks for Poulton's book on colour and Poulton's corrections to Darwinism. About Romanes' attack in Nineteenth Century -"I can't make out what he means.".
Asking for advice about the best type of microscope for a beginner -as a present for his daughter. Likes Ball's book on Use and Disuse.
Could Poulton look at a microscope for him? Mr. J. WaIter Gregory of the Natural History Museum has visited him at Parkstone. Comments on Lloyd Morgan's Animal Life and Intelligence.
Don't worry about the microscope. His daughter would like something else for her birthday. About emerald lava.
About review of Poulton's book that ARW has written in Nature. Hopes Poulton likes it.
Sending on a letter from C. Lloyd Morgan about experiments on inheritance. Will be useful for Poulton when he starts the Institute for Experimental Biology.
Thanks for Weismann's essays and offers criticisms of the first one.
Criticism of Beddard's article on mimicry. About panmixia variation.
About the election of President at one of the societies. Meldola did not get a majority.
Regarding Poulton's paper on the colours of larva pupae. About Darwin's ill-heath - did his children inherit it?.
About maps ARW is asking to have sent to Poulton. Details of heredity case (as mentioned in correspondence with Dr. Budd).
No surplus copies of the coloured maps, only plain maps and hopes he can use it for reference for geographical distribution of insects.
More about Dr. Budd's case - re. heredity.
ARW has been in south Devon for the last 10 days. Mimicry - glad Poulton is taking it up seriously for the museum, suggestions for how to arrange display. Gives reasons for not attending the British Association meeting.
About Poulton's exposure of another American neo-¬Lamarckian in Nature. Criticism of Bateson's book and personal criticism of Bateson and Galton.