Comments about some pieces of German poetry.
Comments about some pieces of German poetry.
Recounts various reports of phenomena in the sky related to the 'great Moscow phenomenon' of 'mock Suns and inverted Arches.'
Thanks for the clippings about an aurora; thoughts on the relationship of poetry to music.
Thanks for the volume of EC's verse; comments on various aspects of poetry.
Much on poetry; for a sonnet on the sun by EC, JH sends some photographs of the sun.
Of toads in rocks and stones, and martins in blocks of ice under rivers.
Thanks and a detailed description of the functioning of a pair of binoculars sent by JD to JH.
Inquires about other sunspot observations made by JH.
Thanks for the photographs WD sent for the dates requested in JH's 1870-4-23.
Comments on sunspot activity; agrees to inclusion of some paragraphs in a paper WD is writing.
Asks AD's advice on an application JH received the previous day. Comments on JH's health.
Writes about JH's health; justifies writing by sending some curves prepared by JH's son Alexander.
JH will not join subscribers for prizes. Objects to so much emphasis on exhibitions of competitive sports, to the detriment of serious education. Feels young people benefit more from spontaneous exercise.
Comments on remarkable solar activity. JH admits he has no theory to explain sunspots.
Thanks WH for materials WH sent, including information about scientific activity in Vienna and papers on meteorites. Recounts some of the history of the Analytical Society. Discusses meteorites and also Homeric references to iron.
Sends a copy of JH's version of the German Rhine Song, which JC requested. Comments favorably on French losses in the Franco-Prussian War. Thanks her for visiting.
Having been placed jointly in charge with G. A. Erman of a B.A.A.S. grant expenditure to support H. J. R. Petersen's recomputation of Gaussian constant for 1829, JH asks for corrections in the statement of the actions funded.
Agrees with GG and G. G. Stokes that the 'Magnetic Reduction Grant' should be approved. G. A. Erman also agrees.
Discusses various telescopes of his father and his father's [erroneous] announcement of his discovery of four additional satellites of Uranus.
Suggests reasons for doubting the distribution of bright stars that RP had reported. Responds to RP's query concerning a statement in Outlines Ast. Encourages RP's hypothesizing on star distribution.