Search: letter in document-type 
Ball, John in author 
Sorted by:

Showing 111 of 11 items

From:
John Ball
To:
John Wrottesley, 2nd Baron Wrottesley
Date:
6 March 1857
Source of text:
MM/4/38, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
John Ball
To:
John Wrottesley, 2nd Baron Wrottesley
Date:
11 March 1857
Source of text:
MM/4/37, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
John Ball
To:
John Tyndall
Date:
Undated
Source of text:
p. 387, Life and Work of John Tyndall
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Tyndall Project
From:
John Ball
To:
John Tyndall
Date:
Undated
Source of text:
p. 387-8, Life and Work of John Tyndall
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Tyndall Project
From:
John Ball
To:
Sir John Herschel
Date:
[22 December 1860]
Source of text:
RS:HS 5.11
Summary:

Is obliged for the maps and articles on physical geography. Comments on the heights of various mountains and encloses a list of queries.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
John Ball
To:
Sir John Herschel
Date:
[11 January 1861]
Source of text:
RS:HS 5.12
Summary:

Sends him latest edition of the book brought out by the Alpine Club. A member has found the height of one of the mountains lower than that usually stated. Has written an article on glaciers for this month's Edinburgh Review.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
John Ball
To:
Sir John Herschel
Date:
[26 January 1861]
Source of text:
RS:HS 5.13
Summary:

Is sorry he wrote his last letter on the day of the sad event. Hopes JH will use the table of heights in the Alpine volume. Comments on the accuracy of various heights given by authorities.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
John Ball
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
31 Jan [1872]
Source of text:
DAR 47: 196–201
Summary:

Expands on a letter to Nature concerning the probability of the survival of a new variety in a given species. Differs with [F. Jenkin’s] argument, to which CD had agreed to a greater extent than JB feels it deserved.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Ball
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
25 June [1874]
Source of text:
DAR 160: 34
Summary:

Received CD’s note late and so could not comply, but promises to vote in future for anyone CD recommends for Athenaeum.

Will have new evidence on dog’s intelligence sent to CD.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Ball
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 Aug 1879
Source of text:
DAR 160: 35
Summary:

Hopes CD will read and comment on his lecture ["Origin of flora of the Alps", Proc. R. Geogr. Soc. (1879)]. Disgrees with CD; JB maintains that the high antiquity of existing plant genera and families explains wide differences in their distribution.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Ball
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 Nov 1879
Source of text:
DAR 160: 36
Summary:

Thanks CD for noticing some difficulties in his hypothesis. Concedes that there is no proof that higher plants are more intolerant of carbon dioxide than lower plants. Argues that the main difference between the lowlands and the high mountains in Palaeozoic times would be the much greater climatic fluctuations that would occur on the mountains. Discusses carbon dioxide diffusion in the Palaeozoic atmosphere. Thinks that the large number of species and genera peculiar to high mountains favours the assumption that "their diffusion must date from a geologically remote period" [see ML 2: 20–2].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail