Search: letter in document-type 
Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
Dobell, H. B. in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 111 of 11 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Horace Benge Dobell
Date:
16 Feb [1863]
Source of text:
Barton L. Smith MD (private collection)
Summary:

Thanks HBD for his lectures On the germs and vestiges of disease [1861].

Thinks his reasoning that the V. M. F. ("force exhibited in the operations of life") is not a "given quantity" is satisfactory.

How far the conditions of life affect the forms of organic life puzzles CD more than any other part of his subject. Thinks he may have underrated its importance in Origin.

Asks for source of the quotation on regeneration in HBD’s work.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Horace Benge Dobell
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
5 Mar 1863
Source of text:
DAR 162: 188
Summary:

At CD’s request HBD has traced the quotation; it is on regeneration from Charles White in W. B. Carpenter’s Comparative physiology (1854), p. 480.

Is gratified that CD thinks some of the arguments in his book [Lectures on the germs of disease (1861)] are satisfactory.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Horace Benge Dobell
Date:
6 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 143: 389
Summary:

Thanks for information [on regeneration quotation].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Horace Benge Dobell
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Apr 1863
Source of text:
DAR 162: 189
Summary:

Sends CD a form he has devised of a proper genealogical table of three or four generations of the families of medical cases, so that hereditary transmission may be more accurately and fully recorded.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Horace Benge Dobell
Date:
21 Apr [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 221.5: 6 (photocopy); Legends (dealers) (catalogue 2, 1990)
Summary:

CD thinks HBD’s tables would be a considerable gain because "the importance of hereditary transmission can hardly be exaggerated from every point of view". Makes suggestions.

Asks him to send any remarkable cases of inheritance to him and, as well, any case of regrowth of amputated additional digit.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Horace Benge Dobell
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
12 May 1863
Source of text:
Darwin Pamphlet Collection–CUL (bound with G 395, Dobell 1862)
Summary:

Sends copy of the table, which now embodies CD’s suggestions [see 4117].

Gives instances of persons born with two thumbs and comments on hereditary factor.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Horace Benge Dobell
Date:
13 May [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 221.5: 7
Summary:

The [genealogical] table seems excellent. Would be obliged for any further information about the children of the cousins – the case surprises CD.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Horace Benge Dobell
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 July 1864
Source of text:
DAR 162: 190
Summary:

Suggests man’s original mode of walking and running is similar to that of quadrupeds.

He also suggests CD answer critics who say no new species has ever been unequivocally traced to its origins, by pointing out that there is no unequivocal account of the origin of surnames.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Horace Benge Dobell
Date:
17 July [1864]
Source of text:
DAR 221.5: 8 (photocopy)
Summary:

Thanks HBD for his note. The analogy of surnames had not occurred to CD – only that of language generally, as shown so well by Lyell. Fears HBD’s argument about progression would not have much weight.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Horace Benge Dobell
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Oct 1871
Source of text:
DAR 162: 191
Summary:

Asks CD’s opinion of his suggestion that a distinctive mark of species may be the duration of pregnancy, incubation, or germination.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Horace Benge Dobell
Date:
7 Oct [1871]
Source of text:
DAR 221.5: 9 (photocopy)
Summary:

"I should expect that the period of gestation will differ very little in the individuals of the same species, as long as its conditions of life remained the same. But I doubt whether it is sure as an absolute criteria; for although little or nothing on this field can be known with respect to species in a state of nature, yet with races of the same species as with dogs and cattle, the period is known slightly to differ. In the generation of seeds from the same capsule there is often the most wonderful and inexplicable difference in the periods".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project