Search: letter in document-type 
Maw, George in author 
Sorted by:

Showing 114 of 14 items

From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 Mar 1861
Source of text:
DAR 171.1(3): 95
Summary:

Asks for a testimonial for Edward Newman.

Discusses the Origin, considers natural selection works well when applied to the evolution of nations and groups of men; on the other hand feels the classification of mineral elements is a damaging analogy as it parallels organic classification but could not be derived by any evolutionary means.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Aug [1861]
Source of text:
DAR 99: 11–12
Summary:

Thanks CD for his letter about GM’s review of the Origin.

Sends instances of correlative organisation and functions which he finds difficult to believe could have accumulated by gradual modifications.

[Letter erroneously dated 1862 by GM.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 June 1862
Source of text:
DAR 99: 5–9
Summary:

Discusses cases of assumed correlation, e.g., facial hair and generative organs, sexual characters in castrated oxen. Finds it difficult to see how correlation of functions which would be useless separately can be accumulated gradually through natural selection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 July 1862
Source of text:
DAR 171.1: 96
Summary:

Thanks CD for sending Orchids.

Reports observations by his uncle relating to the successful breeding of a male mule with a horse.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
19 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 171: 97
Summary:

Discusses the structure and particular uniformities of the Shropshire coal-seams and surrounding strata; speculates on their origins.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
25 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 171: 98
Summary:

Discusses the deposition of coal and considers the possibility of coal aggregating into seams after deposition.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
25 Apr 1863
Source of text:
DAR 171: 99
Summary:

Has obtained fossils from Gibraltar that he believes are human. Requests Lyell’s address so that he can send the bones.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
1 June 1865
Source of text:
DAR 171: 100
Summary:

Reports a monstrous pig that looks like an elephant. It was born of a pregnant sow which had been frightened by a circus elephant. He offers the monster, which died at birth, to any London museum.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 June 1866
Source of text:
DAR 171: 101
Summary:

In response to CD’s request for bud-sports, he sends a piece of a fern-leaved beech.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
9 Jan 1869
Source of text:
DAR 171: 102
Summary:

Planning to visit Gibraltar and Morocco. Is there anything he can do for CD?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
14 Jan 1869
Source of text:
DAR 171: 103
Summary:

In Gibraltar he will make notes on merino lambs and Drosophyllum as CD requests.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 Apr 1869
Source of text:
DAR 171: 104
Summary:

He has found abundant Drosophyllum in Andalusia.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 May 1869
Source of text:
DAR 171: 105
Summary:

He is managing to salvage a few Andalusian Drosophyllum plants from the voyage and will send some to CD.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Nov 1880
Source of text:
DAR 171: 106
Summary:

He has observed several instances of animals’ tails lying to the left in rigor mortis. Is this a general rule?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project