Search: Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
Stainton, H. T. in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 114 of 14 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
20 Oct [1855]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 15)
Summary:

Would be useless to insert CD’s name [on masthead of Entomologists’ Annual] since he does not work on insects.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
13 Apr [1856]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 16)
Summary:

Thanks HTS for Entomologist’s Weekly Intelligencer [no. 2, 12 Apr 1856]. Agrees with his remarks [in "Why did Mr Westwood get the Royal Medal?"], but explains that a change in rules for awarding the Royal Medal has been made. Earlier it had to be given for publications in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, which explains small number of entomologist recipients.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
11 June [1860]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 17)
Summary:

On what kind of moth have pollen-masses of orchids been found cohering? Will ask Mr Parfitt if he is certain he recognised pollen-masses of bee orchid. CD thinks green masses were those of true Orchis.

[In P.S., having received a letter on subject from HTS responding to same query published in Gard. Chron. 9 June 1860:] It is extremely curious that the same moth has been found with pollen-masses in two parts of England.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
20 June [1860]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 18)
Summary:

Has had a very satisfactory answer from Mr Parfitt. Asks HTS to insert query in Entomologist’s Weekly Intelligencer and also to answer it himself. ["Do the Tineina and other small moths suck flowers?", Collected papers 2: 35–6.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
18 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 20)
Summary:

Asks for information on coloration and proportions of sexes in butterflies and moths for his work on sexual selection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A6–7
Summary:

Sends a preliminary reply to CD’s query [5890]. Ten males to one female among captured micro-Lepidoptera. Six females to four or five males in those he has bred. HTS is aware this is diametrically opposed to information from [Alexander] Wallace and Bates, but the true proportion of sexes can only be ascertained by breeding.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
21 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Special Collections MSS DAR 21)
Summary:

Discusses factors possibly influencing the sex of caterpillars. Is gathering information on sex ratios in insects and would welcome any cases in which males seem to outnumber females.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
28 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
E.W. Classey Ltd (dealers) (1974)
Summary:

Asks whether the colouring of particular butterflies has any protective function, to ascertain whether the function is other than sexual.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
29 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 85: B52-3; DAR 86: A16;
Summary:

Replies to CD on proportion of sexes in butterflies, coloration of moths, and courtship. Encloses copies of letters on these subjects between HTS, Henry Doubleday, and John Hellins.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
2 Mar [1868]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Manuscripts MSS DAR 23)
Summary:

Thanks HTS for his valuable information. Hopes to arrive at probable answer to question of proportion of males to females in the progeny of butterflies bred in domestication.

On courtship of butterflies, CD believes something more than chance is involved in determining which male is successful.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Mar 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A19–20
Summary:

Protective coloration in butterflies.

[Alexander] Wallace’s suggestion that collecting larger larvae of females accounts for error in counting proportion of sexes.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 Jan 1874
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Manuscripts MSS DAR 25)
Summary:

Encloses R. McLachlan’s certificate of nomination for Royal Society. Hopes CD will sign it, as McLachlan is the most philosophic member of the Entomological Society in years.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
11 Feb [1876]
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (General Manuscripts MSS DAR 26)
Summary:

Has signed enclosure [Royal Society nomination for McLachlan] with pleasure.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
Date:
28 Sept 1881
Source of text:
Natural History Museum, Library and Archives (L MSS DAR A/27)
Summary:

Thanks HTS for a Dahlia flower, but analogous cases of such "bud-variation" have been observed before.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project