To William Thiselton-Dyer   30 May 1884

30/5/84.1

 

In accordance with your wish, dear Mr Dyer, I caused just to be shipped a number of ferntrees (24) to you.2 They are just fresh from the ranges, 5-8' high, and in a growing state. It cost no more freight to send the living stems as the dead stems, as payment has to be made by measurement, not by weight. They were just in time at the very eve of the departure of the “Iberia;” but there was no time to get a bill of loading;3 as however the letters are passed on by rail from Brindisi, this letter will likely reach you before the Iberia is in the London-Port. To make doubly sure, I enclose an order on the Capt. or Chief Officer of the Iberia, which your Agent should at once put into motion.

Both the Capt. and Chief Officer received a ferntree in donation, and will doubtless take such care of them on the voyage as can be put on loose goods and speed the delivery in London. It would have added very much to the costs, had I shipped them in cases. If rats and salt water are kept from the stems, they will likely arrive mostly in vitality, and it will be better for the epiphytes, to be grown on these stems, that they should be living, and you will get at the same time, a spendid4 ferntree-grove! I have paid all expenses for lifting these stems in the ranges, to fetch them out by oxen-drays (horses no use on such boggy and abrupt places), to get them to Melbourne and free on board; but the freight will have to be paid in London. I really have no public nor private fund, to pay the freight also, especially as my bid5 of money is locked up and partly lost by the recent crushing failure of the great London Oriental Banking Corporation, at whose Melbourne-Branch I had my private current account for more than 20 years, without ever asking for an overdraft or ever having interest for my deposits. Lord Normanby suffers also by the downfall of this once so great bank.6

A bill of lading, concerning the 24 ferns7 will be sent by first Penins. & Oriental Steamer

A first portion of the plants, wanting in the Kew-herbarium will go by this post, and by the successive mails other portions will be sent; this will simplify the matter to me here, and render it less costly.8 You will hardly think, that freight to & fro, cartage, clea[r]ing and emballage of the 70 cases, sent by me for the Flora Australiensis to Kew has cost over £300.9

I may not have all the species to spare, which are wanting at Kew, nor am I sure, whether you might not have picked out some more from the Census, where the — instead of B. fl.10 is so readily indicative of what is additional.11

The new gesneriaceous plant from New Guinea is a Dichrotrich[um] (D. Chalmersii), as I now see from the character of the genus in D.C.’s Monographiae,12 unless the fruit should turn out different. It is better, that I should correct myself, than be corrected by others; so I will publish a few lines here on the subject, which does not hinder to give fuller publicity to this beautiful plant in England.13 I misunderstood the characteristics of the anthers in the “genera.”14 - I am almost confined to the sickbed at present.15

Regardfully your

Ferd. von Mueller.

 

Look besides to the two supplements of the “Census”.16

If you trust your hand down into the hollow, surrounded by the stipes, you will feel at once, which of the ferns have formed the commencement of new sound fronds, coiled up.

As my additional species are fairly well described, I never thought it of much importance that European Botanist should see originals. So my sending is more for the benefit of Kew.17

 

Dichrotrichum Chalmersii

Annotated in Thiselton-Dyer’s hand: ansd 17/8/84. Letter not found.
ferntrees underlined in blue pencil. The request was made in J. Hooker to M, 14 March 1884.
there . . .bill underlined in blue pencil.
splendid?
bit?
The Bank was an imperial bank, with businesses in many parts of the British empire. It had lent heavily to the depressed coffee industry. The bank's announcement of severe losses in April 1884 caused a run on some of its branches, forcing it to close on 3 May 1884 (Schuler, 1992, p. 57). The Victorian Government insisted on priority for debts owed to it, at the expense of note holders and depositors (Fitz-Gibbon and Gizycki [2001], p. 21). See also the editorial in the London Times, Saturday, 3 May 1884; p. 11 col. D, and Argus, 5 May 1884, p. 4.
24 ferns is underlined in blue pencil in the MS.
See M to W. Thiselton-Dyer, 10 January 1884. There is a red diagonal pencil mark next to a first and a blue pencil line next to a first ...other portions.
There are double blue pencil lines next toAustraliensis ... £300.
In B82.13.06, M gave references such as ‘B. fl. V, 152’ and ‘M. fr. VII, 10’ to the pages of Bentham’s (1863-78) Flora Australiensis and his own Fragmenta where species were mentioned; for those not in Bentham he inserted a ‘—’ in the relevant column.
There is a red pencil mark next toadditional.
C. B. Clarke (1883), p. 52.
M briefly described Dichrotrichum chalmersiiin B84.06.02, p. 14.
Bentham & Hooker (1862-83), vol. 2, part 2, p. 1014. See also M to J. Hooker, 27 May 1884.
There is a diagonal red pencil next tocorrect myself, which may be intended to mark that passage or the postscriptLook besides … "Census". that is written in the margin at that point.

B84.13.06 and B85.13.09. The second supplement had not been published at the time of this letter: it is unlikely even to have been prepared, since it includes references to articles up to December 1884.

two supplements is underlined in triplicate in blue pencil.

A memorandum from D. Oliver to J. Hooker 28 August 1884 is filed with this letter (f. 101):

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT. F v. Mueller’s letter “30. 5/ 84”

The Gesneracea to which he refers recd. at Herbarium last June. - [I] [reported] [above] as a Dichrostrichium. M. has found it out for himself since.

At risk of repeating names of our Desiderata of Australia I have had Mueller's “Census” [compared] with [our] Steudel, as M. suggests, & the accompanying list made out.

28 Aug. ’84

D. Oliver

The memo is annotated: Baron Mueller informed Sept 1 84 JDH See J. Hooker to M, 31 August 1884, in this edition as 84-08-31a.


Please cite as “FVM-84-05-30a,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells accessed on 25 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/84-05-30a