Search: 1780-1789::1789::01 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 114 of 14 items

From:
Benjamin Hutchinson
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
8 January 1789
Source of text:
L&P/9/112, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
William Herschel
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
1789
Source of text:
L&P/9/123, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
John Hunter
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
1789
Source of text:
L&P/9/129, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Richard Walker
To:
Henry Cavendish
Date:
1789
Source of text:
L&P/9/134, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
4 January 1789
Source of text:
MM/7/63, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Mary Watson- Wentworth
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
11 Jan 1789
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/15/79, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sends specimen of 'Phormium hyacinthoides', a new genus. Smith to thank [Edmund] Davall for the coloured plate he sent of his intended work.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Charles Hope
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
17 Jan 1789
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/23/26, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Unable to supply specimen of newly found crystalised mineral for [William] Thomson [(c 1760-1806), mineralogist and physician], as he only has one specimen himself. Pleased to hear Smith is composing his botanical lectures and undertaking new edition of "Systema [naturae]".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Unknown
Date:
[1789]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/23/35, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Draft of Smith's review John Berkenhout's [(1730-1791), physician and writer] to "Clavis Anglica linguae botanicae" (1789), which appeared in the "Analytical Review" of March or April 1791.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
John Pitchford
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
6 Jan 1789
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/24/69, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Comments on 'Ophrys paludos' of "Flora Danica", which resembles 'O. loeslii' Linnaeus; and 'Equisetum sylvaticum', which he discovered to be 'E. fluviatile'. Sends specimens of 'Carex gracilis' Curtis and 'C. caespitosa'; observations, including remarks by [Samuel] Goodenough. Requests 'Dianthus glaucus'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Filippo Cavolini
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
18 Jan 1789
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/3/63, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Received Smith's letter of 19 September 1788. Thanks for book by Mr Ellis and one of Smith's Latin dissertations. Shall send copies of his dissertation on the propagation of fish in which he discusses two hermaphrodite fish, 'Perca' and 'Canna'. Is following this publication with one on propagation of cartilaginous fish and one on propagation of crabs, asks whether it is preferred for them to be written in Latin or Italian. Admires Smith's own work on the propagation of the species and his notes on Linnaeus. Not convinced by [Johann] Hedwig's arguments.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Nicholas Gwyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 Jan 1789
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/5/26, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

[William Beeston] Coyte is coming to London and will visit Smith. Discusses Smith's publication plans for "Plantarum icones"; "Reliquiae rudbeckianae"; and new edition of "Philosophia Botanica", hoping that this last will be published by the Cambridge University press. Samuel Ewer of Lincoln's Inn Fields, Coyte's brother-in-law, is collecting a library of botany and will subscribe to all of Smith's works. Anger at [William] Curtis' corrections of Linnaeus. Smith's 'Centaurea [solstitialis]' has not produced any viable seed and Jonas has failed in making a successful cutting. Thanks for 'Forsythia' of Frasier which turns out to be only 'Decumaria carbara L'. Can procure Scottish plants for Smith from Dr Ramm. Would welcome [Joseph Franz ?] Jacquin to his home in the summer if Smith invites him. Coyte is to visit Westmoreland, advised to study [William] Hudson beforehand, intends to ask [James] Dickson about having him staying. Displeased from reading [Giovanni Antonio] Scopoli. Dissatisfied with [Caspar] Bauhin's [(1560-1624) Swiss botanist] "Prodrumus" and unsurprised by Linnaeus' rare use of it. Enjoyed reading "Hortus Upsaliensis" over the winter. [Charles] Sutton has a "brother botanist" at Norwich, a chaplain of the Bishop, and associates in [William] Kirby [(1759-1850) entomologist], and [Peter] Lathbury of Orford, Suffolk, [(1760-1820) rector]. [John] Pi[t]chford requires 'Equisetum sylvaticum', has a 'Carex strigosa' found last summer near Bungay, Suffolk. Asks Smith for copy of Kew catalogue. In postscript if Smith can acquire seeds of 'Epilobium latifolium' through [Joseph Franz] Jacquin and has two 'Geranium palustre' and a 'Sal. alpinum'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Charles Louis L'Héritier de Brutelle
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
29 Jan 1789
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/5/51, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

The genus "Broussonetia".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Pierre Marie Auguste Broussonet
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
1 Jan 1789
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/113, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Asks for news.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Pierre Marie Auguste Broussonet
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
22 Jan 1789
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/114, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Letter sent by Broussonet in Paris to Smith in London. Thanks for election as FMLS. His brother's studies, hopes to take him to London and Edinburgh. De Jussieu. Lemonnier appointed Physician to Louis XVI.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London