Search: 1860-1869::1868::02 in date 
Cambridge University Library in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 94 items

From:
Roland Trimen
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
10 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 178: 186, DAR 84.1: 135b
Summary:

Sends prospectus of forthcoming work by his brother [Henry Trimen] and W. T. Thiselton-Dyer [Flora of Middlesex (1869)]. Hopes CD will subscribe.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Bartholomew James Sulivan
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
13 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
DAR 83: 188–9, DAR 177: 291
Summary:

Sends photo of four Fuegians, including Jemmy Button’s son.

Reports incident of two wild stallions on the Falklands acting together in an attempt to take a troop of mares from an introduced English horse [see Descent 2: 241].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[16–20 Feb 1868]
Source of text:
DAR 178: 80
Summary:

Encloses information on sex ratios in thoroughbred horses.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Gabriel Stokes, 1st baronet
Date:
18 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
CUL (Add 7656: D73)
Summary:

Wants to know how the colour of the eye of the peacock’s tail is produced, whether it depends upon colouring matter in the feathers or reflection, and whether any varying structural change will account for the series of colours surrounding it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Robert McLachlan
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A8–9, DAR 82: A88–9
Summary:

On numerical proportions of sexes in insects; coloration. Dimorphism in dragonflies (Agrion) in which usual coloration is reversed in sexes [see Descent 1: 362–4].

Wallace seems to ride his hobby too hard.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 106: B70–2, DAR 86: A10–11
Summary:

Responds to CD’s queries on polygamy in birds and orang.

Discusses sexual selection and secondary characters; colours and sexual preference.

Expresses his admiration for Pangenesis; it is superior to Herbert Spencer’s theory.

ARW differs somewhat with CD’s chapter on causes of variability [ch. 22 in Variation]. Thinks several of CD’s arguments are unsound.

Briefly discusses how natural selection might aid in producing sterility between allied species.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26[–7] Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 102: 200–3, DAR 94: 67
Summary:

Could not believe Owen to be so demoniacal as to write the Athenæum review [of Variation].

Gardeners’ Chronicle review [see 5918] is weak. CD’s ideas on causes of variation may be as hazy as the reviewer’s.

Huxley’s clever remark on Pangenesis. JDH’s view of Pangenesis as fundamental to development doctrines, but nothing is gained by formulation in terms of germs or gemmules.

Tries to answer question on last page of CD’s letter anent sexuality.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Leonard Jenyns; Leonard Blomefield
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A14–15, DAR 84.1: 116–17
Summary:

On polygamous birds and the pairing of birds. Late singing of males. [see Descent 2: 107.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Robert Russell
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 85: B21; DAR 86: C16
Summary:

A reply to CD’s inquiry in Gardeners’ Chronicle [Collected papers 2: 135]. The proportion of females to males in lambs of highland black-faced sheep.

Sends paper on conditions that favour predominance of plants.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
William Farr
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 164: 30, DAR 85: B116
Summary:

Encloses table showing proportion of sexes in Rutland.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
29 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 85: B52-3; DAR 86: A16;
Summary:

Replies to CD on proportion of sexes in butterflies, coloration of moths, and courtship. Encloses copies of letters on these subjects between HTS, Henry Doubleday, and John Hellins.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Galton, E. S.
To:
Darwin, Emma
Date:
21 February 1868
Source of text:
DAR 210.14: 4
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Darwin Family Letters
Text Online
From:
Hemmings, Henry
To:
Darwin, G. H.
Date:
3 February 1868
Source of text:
DAR 251: 2242
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Darwin Family Letters
From:
Asa Gray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[25 Feb 1868 or later]
Source of text:
DAR 165: 102
Summary:

Discusses arrangements for American edition of Variation.

Observations on apparently inherited instinct in a dog.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Blenkiron, Jr
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[c. Feb 1868?]
Source of text:
DAR 83: 184
Summary:

Answers for father, who is ill, on difference between manes of stallions and mares.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Edward Blyth
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[after 3 Feb 1868]
Source of text:
DAR 160: 210
Summary:

Recommends J. Scott’s paper on crossing varieties of Verbascum.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Daniel Oliver
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before Feb 1868]
Source of text:
DAR 108: 81
Summary:

Notes on the taxonomy of Primula.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Spence Bate
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[17 Feb 1868]
Source of text:
DAR 82: A61–4
Summary:

On the proportion of sexes in crabs; coloration and structural differences.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
J Daly
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 9 Feb 1868]
Source of text:
DAR 195.1: 50
Summary:

Corrections [incorporated in 2d issue of Variation].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Unidentified
Date:
[Feb–Apr 1868?]
Source of text:
DAR 96: 38
Summary:

Suggests, if further notice is to be taken of Variation, that the reviewer grapple with the subject of Pangenesis. Thanks him for his fair and friendly spirit.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail