Search: 1870-1879::1874::07 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 2140 of 86 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
4 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 95: 324–5
Summary:

It would be interesting to prove that some plants feed on decayed animal matter whilst others like Drosera can digest fresh animal matter. Suggests the method for observing this.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Fayrer, 1st baronet
Date:
4 July [1874]
Source of text:
DAR 144: 104
Summary:

Suggests experiment involving cobra poison on white corpuscles. Thanks for offer of Crotalus poison.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Fayrer, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 164: 110
Summary:

Will do experiments CD suggests.

Is sending his book on the poisonous snakes of India [The Thanatophidia of India (1872)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Ralfs
Date:
8 July 1874
Source of text:
The Huntington Library (HM 76527)
Summary:

Thanks for the Pinguicula plants, which have recovered, and asks if he could also send Utricularia, since his other supplies have failed.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Amy Richenda (Amy) Ruck; Amy Richenda (Amy) Darwin
To:
Francis Darwin
Date:
6 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 59.1: 71
Summary:

Information about insects on Pinguicula leaves.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Frans Cornelis (Franciscus Cornelius) Donders
Date:
7 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 143: 417
Summary:

Asks about the effect of atropine on the eye. Is interested in parallel case: influence of phosphate of ammonia on glands of Drosera.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Julius Victor Carus
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 161: 96
Summary:

Thanks for proofs [of Descent, 2d English ed.].

Publisher would like better photographs for Expression [2d German ed.].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 103: 204–5
Summary:

The appetite of Nepenthes for hard-boiled egg is prodigious.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Evan Buchanan Baxter
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 160: 96
Summary:

Sends quotation from R. C. Virchow which contravenes CD’s statement in Expression that there is no voluntary control of the iris.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Julius Victor Carus
Date:
9 July [1874]
Source of text:
Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz (Slg. Darmstaedter Lc 1859: Darwin, Charles, Bl. 116–117)
Summary:

Advises JVC on how his publisher might deal with problem of getting satisfactory heliotype copies for 2d [German] edition of Expression.

Regrets that he will again be away in August, when JVC might have come for a visit.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Ralfs
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
9 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 58.1: 73–4
Summary:

Sends specimens of Pinguicula and observations made on them. [See Insectivorous plants, pp. 390–1.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
David Moir; David Moore
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
9 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 58.1: 75–6
Summary:

Sends an Utricularia and a Drosophyllum.

Observations on Pinguicula grandiflora. [See Insectivorous plants, p. 390.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Edward Emanuel Klein
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
10 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 58.1: 77–8
Summary:

Reports results [partly excised] of examination of fibro-cartilage subjected to artificial gastric juice and to Drosera secretion. [See Insectivorous plants, pp. 104–5.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
10 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 52: D1–2, 10–14
Summary:

Sets out some of his ideas on the effects of disuse on an organ. Disuse as a cause of reduction.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
David Moir; David Moore
Date:
12 July 1874
Source of text:
National Botanic Gardens of Ireland Library, Glasnevin (DSS/DM/1/1/16)
Summary:

Thanks for Drosophyllum. No longer needs Utricularia.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Frans Cornelis (Franciscus Cornelius) Donders
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
12 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 58.1: 79–80
Summary:

On hearing of CD’s work with Drosera, tells of his experiment showing extreme sensitivity of the iris of a dog’s eye to atropine. [See Insectivorous plants, p. 173.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Ralfs
Date:
13 July [1874]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.443)
Summary:

Discusses specimens of Utricularia.

Mentions JR’s work on desmids [The British Desmidieae [Desmidiae!?] (1848)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Frans Cornelis (Franciscus Cornelius) Donders
Date:
15 July 1874
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.)
Summary:

Discusses effect of atropine solution on eye,

and effect of phosphate of ammonia solution on gland of Drosera.

Would like to see work by T. W. Engelmann and possibly one by Dr De Ruyter.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 103: 206–7
Summary:

Asks what can be the meaning of appendages to tips of leaflets of enclosed Acacia or Mimosa.

Is at fibrin today.

Michael Foster suggests coagulation of protoplasm may be diseased, not digestive, symptom.

F. M. Balfour is at Kew today.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
16 July 1874
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.444)
Summary:

Thanks GJR for his letter, regrets pressure of other work prevents his giving GJR’s remarks the attention they deserve. GJR makes clearer how an organ that has started to decrease will go on decreasing.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project