Search: 1870-1879::1874::07 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 4160 of 86 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
16 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 95: 326–7
Summary:

The Acacia must be Belt’s "Bulls’ horns".

The complexity of Utricularia has driven Frank and CD almost mad. Suspects it is necrophagous, i.e., it cannot digest, but absorbs decaying animal matter.

Foster is certainly in error. Every insect that Drosera catches causes aggregation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Theodosia Louisa Marshall
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 July [1874]
Source of text:
DAR 58.1: 123–4, 127
Summary:

She and her father have been counting insect remains on Pinguicula hairs.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 103: 208–9
Summary:

Two Nepenthes have devoured two pieces of fibrin [sketch shows size] in three days.

Has CD any objection to JDH’s giving an account of CD’s Drosera observations at Belfast [BAAS meeting] in a résumé of pitcher-plant results ["Address to the department of botany and zoology", Rep. BAAS 44 (1874): 102–16]?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Erasmus Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[19? July 1874]
Source of text:
Cornford Family Papers (DAR 275: 53); DAR 58.1: 135–6
Summary:

WED encloses a letter from H. M. Wilkinson about Utricularia and sundew.

H. M. Wilkinson has examined bladders of Utricularia; doubts that they absorb or digest insects.

H. M. Wilkinson describes dragonfly trapped by sundew [Drosera].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
20 July [1874]
Source of text:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (JDH/3/6 Insectivorous plants 1873–8: 32–37)
Summary:

"It is grand about Nepenthes."

JDH is welcome to notice in any way any of CD’s published or unpublished results with insectivorous plants. Gives an abstract of his observations on Drosera.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
James Dwight Dana
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 69: A71–2
Summary:

Thanks CD for Coral reefs [2d ed. (1874)].

JDD will correct his misunderstanding of CD on one point in the next edition of his book [Corals and coral islands].

Suggests CD consult Charles Wilkes’s Narrative [1844] for more accurate observations on Pacific islands.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Douglas Alexander Spalding
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 177: 221
Summary:

Thanks for CD’s son’s observations

and for allowing DAS to visit Down.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 103: 210–13
Summary:

Stupefied by CD’s trouble and kindness. All he wanted for Belfast meeting was assurance that mention of published work on Drosera, etc., in Nature, etc., would not interfere with CD’s book.

Would like his Nepenthes results to go to CD or to Royal Society, but prefers CD take them.

Cephalotus very puzzling.

Peas and cabbage grow twice as fast after two days’ immersion in Nepenthes as when placed in distilled water, but four days’ immersion seems to kill them.

Has a splendid Australian Drosera twice as big as D. rotundifolia.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Fayrer, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 164: 111
Summary:

Is glad CD approves of his book;

has not yet done any more experiments on snake poison.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Edward Frankland
Date:
22 July 1874
Source of text:
The John Rylands Library, The University of Manchester
Summary:

Asks for the specific gravity of common phosphate of ammonia.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
23 July [1874]
Source of text:
DAR 95: 328–31
Summary:

JDH should do as he likes with insectivorous plant materials.

He has always thought telling JDH what he has been doing was as good as publishing.

Cephalotus seems as horrid a puzzle as Utricularia.

Nepenthes will turn out a great job if the pitchers of different species act differently. JDH’s paper on Nepenthes [Rep. BAAS 44 (1874): 102–16] is too long for CD’s book. Well deserves a place in Philosophical Transactions.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
24 [July 1874]
Source of text:
Michael Silverman (dealer) (Catalogue 25, 2006)
Summary:

Arrangements for the visit to Southampton.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Lauder Brunton, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 July [1874]
Source of text:
DAR 160: 339 (fragile)
Summary:

Encloses a tracing of a portrait of John Bunyan showing the differences of the two sides of the face.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 52: D3–7
Summary:

Encloses a copy of a letter from H. Spencer giving his opinion on GJR’s views on disuse and a draft of GJR’s reply to Spencer.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Edward Emanuel Klein
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 July 1874
Source of text:
DAR 57: 130v
Summary:

Gives details of the smallest micrococci distinctly discernible under a microscope.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Price
Date:
27 [July 1874]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.445)
Summary:

Discusses Utricularia sent by JP.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Francis Darwin
Date:
[c. 27 July 1874]
Source of text:
DAR 271.4: 7
Summary:

Has been examining Utricularia minor. Same essential structure but catches smaller Entomostraca. One bladder had 24, another 20, and another 15 Entomostraca. "What slaughter! We must make out the functions of the beast––".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
[27 July 1874]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 25
Summary:

Advises GHD to get an eminent counsel. If counsel’s opinion is that the reviewer [Mivart, in "Primitive man", Q. Rev. 137 (1874): 40–77] has falsified GHD’s statements, GHD should send the opinion to the Quarterly Review and demand publication, and if refused publish elsewhere. Then CD must decide whether to cut John Murray [publisher of Q. Rev.] which will put CD in a nice perplexity [over his rights to the stereotyped editions of past works].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
28 July [1874]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.446)
Summary:

Comments on Spencer’s terms.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Price
Date:
28 July [1874]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.)
Summary:

Thanks JP for note.

Sends instructions for mailing Utricularia plants to Down in his absence.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project