Search: 1860-1869::1863::02 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 6180 of 144 items

From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[23 Feb 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 101: 105–7
Summary:

Owen’s cutting critique of Lyell’s book [Antiquity of man] in Athenæum [21 Feb 1863, pp. 262–3]. JDH despises Owen’s mind too much to hate his individuality.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Hermann Crüger
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 161: 275
Summary:

Will observe fertilisation of melastomads as CD requests.

Observations on fertilisation by ants.

Detailed observations on sexes in Catasetum, which were made before he received Orchids and which differ from CD’s findings.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
24[–5] Feb [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 183
Summary:

CD’s opinion of Lyell’s Antiquity of man and of Owen’s comment on it.

Disappointed Lyell has not spoken out on species and on man.

Pleasure of new hothouse and the plants JDH supplied for it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Thomas Henry Huxley
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
25 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 166: 299
Summary:

Pleads guilty to both criticisms of "Miss Henrietta Minor Rhadamanthus Darwin" [see 3896] of points in his Lectures [to working men].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[26 Feb 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 101: 108–10
Summary:

Criticism of Antiquity of man; its public reception.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Maw
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
25 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 171: 98
Summary:

Discusses the deposition of coal and considers the possibility of coal aggregating into seams after deposition.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
26 [Feb 1863]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 191)
Summary:

Praise of Man’s place.

Owen’s muddling letter in Athenæum [21 Feb 1863, pp. 262–3].

Is disappointed in Lyell’s excessive caution on species and origin of man [in Antiquity of man].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Francis Walker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 181: 3
Summary:

Identifies flies sent to him by CD. [CD note states that these were found with orchid pollinia adhering to them.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 229: 10
Summary:

A diploma. CD is elected a corresponding member.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Daniel Oliver
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 108: 178
Summary:

Answers CD’s query on Primula longiflora and P. scotica.

Would like abstract of CD’s paper ["Two forms of Linum", Collected papers 2: 93–105] for Natural History Review.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Thomas Wright
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 181: 178
Summary:

Regrets he did not make the statement [unspecified] referred to by CD.

Believes the Origin has been very valuable, even among those not disposed to agree with transmutation, in giving a great check to "species manufacture".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Lubbock, 4th baronet and 1st Baron Avebury
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 170: 37
Summary:

Will come to dine on Monday unless he hears to the contrary.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Maw
Date:
28 Feb [1863]
Source of text:
Royal Horticultural Society, Lindley Library (MAW/1/9)
Summary:

Thanks GM for a curious lily.

Recommends some papers on coal.

Gives his opinion on the importance of forming theories if one is to be a good and original observer.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Daniel Oliver
Date:
20 [Feb 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 261.10: 41 (EH 88206024)
Summary:

Having trouble understanding laws of phyllotaxy in order to grasp Hugh Falconer’s objections.

L. C. Treviranus on Primula [see 3980] misses the "prettiness" of the adaptations.

John Scott says P. scotica is never dimorphic.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Gabriel Stokes, 1st baronet
Date:
[12 Feb 1863?]
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library Add 7656: D76
Summary:

Thanks GGS for calculation [to determine the chances of the same peculiarity recurring in a family, see Variation 2: 5]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Daniel Oliver
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Feb 1863
Source of text:
DAR 173: 20
Summary:

DO thinks an essay [Alexander Braun’s "Rejuvenescence", Ray Society (1853)] is not worth reading with respect to some difficulty concerning phyllotaxy.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
Fourth Duke of Northumberland
Date:
2 February 1863
Source of text:
Columbia University Library, Spec MS Coll Smith, D.E. Historical
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
Duchess of Northumberland
Date:
2 February 1863
Source of text:
National Library of Australia MS 5907
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
Cornelia Augusta Hewett Crosse
Date:
5 February 1863
Source of text:
RI MS F1 N/1/40
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
Angela Georgina Burdett Coutts
Date:
6 February 1863
Source of text:
BL add MS 85284, f.79-80
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
Document type
Transcription available