Search: Smith, James Edward in addressee 
Smith, James Edward in correspondent 
1820-1829::1824 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 49 items

From:
William Roscoe
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
19 Jan 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/17/133, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for hospitality during his stay at Norwich. Literary activities: his work on [Alexander] Pope [(1688-1744), poet] drawing to a conclusion with just the biography to be printed; expecting to publish first part of his botanical work ["Monandrian plants"], in which is giving give the generic and specific characters and descriptions in English as his botanical phraseology is too limited; as Smith and [William] Roxburgh did in "Exotic Botany" and "Flora Indica".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
William Roscoe
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
[7 Jun 1824]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/17/134, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

They are correct to think that the reviewer of Smith's "English Flora" in the "Phil. Journal" is [James] Bicheno. Ongoing publication of his "Monandrian Plants"; his biography and new edition of [Alexander] Pope's works complete, prepared for "much controversy & some abuse"; his catalogue of Holkham manuscripts [home of Thomas William Coke] also progressing. Met [Thomas William Coke], Lady Anne [(1803-1844), Coke's wife], and boisterous "little Tom". Leaving London soon; dined with Mrs Martin, Fanny [Smith's sisters], and [Nathaniel] Kindersley [Smith's cousin].

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Francis Hamilton
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 May 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/147, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for "Flora Anglica". Making strong progress with "Hortus Malabaricus". Has given commentary on the first volume of the "Herbarium Amboinense" to the Wernerian Society in Edinburgh but doubtful whether it will appear. [William Jackson] Hooker is to compile detailed observations that are suited for neither commentaries and publish them in the Edinburgh Philosophical Journal. Complains that Venlenat, [Augustin Pyramus] de Candolle, [Carl Sigismund] Kunth "and other Goths are overwhelming us with new orders", which he believes [Robert] Brown may be "aiding and abetting", and that they do not understand the difference between an order and a genus as established by Linnaeus.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Edmund Henry Barker
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
30 Mar 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/4, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sending a pamphlet. Engaged with W K Brown in promoting a subscription and a Committee in Norfolk for Greek independence, has succeeded in forming a Committee in Suffolk. Comments on varying levels of support received from political figures including [Sir John] Gladstone and [George] Canning. A controversy at Cambridge University between Heads of the Senate and Dr French and Professor Sedgwick. Asks whether an identification as to the language of the foreign words in the appendix to Dioscorides has been made. Remarks on [Johann Gottlob] Schneider's translation of Theophrastus and other works. Working on a translation of Schneider's Greek and German dictionary. Notes Samuel Parr's 77th birthday.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Antonio Bertoloni
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
14 Jun 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/42, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sending his book "Amoenitates Italicae" to the Linnean Society via a "kind English lady". Offers to send specimens of Italian plants if desired.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Joseph Bosworth
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
2 Oct 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/2/72, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Congratulates Smith on his return to health and goes on to praise Smith's "most valuable and learned works on botany", the women in his family are especially delighted with the "The English Flora" and Smith's "precision" compares favourably to the "vapid conversations and trite introductions to botany that have lately appeared". For the sake of women readers suggests that in his "Introduction to Botany" Smith accentuates the "peculiar" words so as to aid pronunciation.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
William Townsend Aiton
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
28 Nov 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/20/12, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Unable to provide Smith with specimens of the red-twigged lime, the original Kew plant of Smith's reference being dead some years and the substitute, having produced no fruit, is of doubtful accuracy, and herbariums of [Robert] Teesdale and the Gardens provide no examples. Sends specimens of New Holland plants collected by [Allan] Cunningham [(1791-1839), botanist and explorer] and parcel for Lady [Pleasance] Smith.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Jean Vincent Yves Degland
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
31 Jul 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/21/111, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Observations on 'Cheiranthus cheiri'; requests Smith's opinion. Sending specimen of 'Cheiranthus fruticulosus', and of doubtful 'C. erysimoides', for identification.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Richard Bright
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
10 Feb 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/21/30, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Addresses Smith as Chair of the Committee of the Bristol Institution. Aware of Smith's offer to lecture through his letter to Revd M Maurice but forced to decline it as their programme for spring is already full and they would not be able to guarantee proper support for an additional course of lectures. Will communicate with Smith about lecturing in the autumn or next spring.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Richard Bright
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
10 Mar 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/21/31, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Bristol Institution thanks Smith for his good wishes; usefulness of the Institution. Responds to Smith's queries about botanical part of a course of lectures held at the Institution; an application for second course rejected.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Richard Bright
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
16 Dec 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/21/32, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Invites Smith to lecture at the Bristol Institution next spring; requests terms. Smith can obtain plants for demonstration from nursery garden of Mr Miller, late of Sweets & Miller, just outside Bristol; his collection of hardy and tender exotic plants equals any for sale.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Elizabeth Cobbold
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Jan [1824]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/21/67, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks the "highly useful book", which will renew her knowledge of English botany [probably "English Flora"]; she will endeavour to give her protege, Miss Lawton, a taste for botany. Her aspiration after fame grows stronger in "the evening" of her life; determined to "attain celebrity" as a writer.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Susan Corrie
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
30 Mar 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/21/71, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for "English Flora". Her health. Asks if the orchids 'Ophrys apifera' and its relatives are confined to the northern hemisphere or are also found in the tropics.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
John Hawkins
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
2 Sep 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/104, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Explains difficulties of making Smith an advance payment for his work on "Flora Graeca", principally being fear of Smith's death and its consequences for completion of the work. He and [Thomas] Platt [(d 1842), one of John Sibthorp's executors, supervised the publication of "Flora Graeca"] hope the work can be finished in the next few years by borrowing money from University of Oxford and limiting the number of copies made. Asks Smith to supply list of all of Sibthorp's provincial floras, taken from Sibthorp's journals. Executor of will of Mr Jones of Chelsea gives Smith permission to inspect the collections he had expressed an interest in.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Edward Forster
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
22 Jan 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/13, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Pleased with Smith's work on 'Rubus'; observations on genus and species. Pleased that Smith could elucidate 'Potentilla'; obervations on genus and species. Showed the 'Rubus' proof to [James] Bicheno.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Furly Forster
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
3 Jan 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/49, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sending cask of cranberries. Very unwell for the last 7 months, which has delayed his projected work on 'Rubus'; offers to send Merten's 'Rubus'. Anticipating Smiths annual visit. Doctors say his complaint is a disorder in his liver. Comments on naming of his 'Rubus elegans'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Samuel Hailstone
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
27 Oct 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/71, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

He and James Backhouse found 'Woodsia hyperbora' growing near High Teesdale, Yorkshire, last summer. Was unable to find 'Cyathea dentata', though may have mistaken 'Woodsia hyperbora' for it. 'Cyathea fragilis', 'Asplenium viride', and 'A. trichomanes' grow there abundantly. Sending specimens of the 'Woodsia hyperbora'. Found 'Aspedium lobatum' in woods near Redcar, [Yorkshire].

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Alexander Macleay
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
22 May 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/AM/171, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Apologises for delay in replying to Smith's letter of 27 April [1824]; sorry to hear of his severe indisposition, hopes to see Smith before Linnean Society's last meeting in June. Lists new members of Council. Balance in Treasurer's hands is £192, compared to last year's balance of £34 on the other side. Forty-two Fellows elected in the last year, greatest number in any one year. Informed by Solicitor General that he agrees with Attorney General that the Asiatic Society is entitled to a charter as applied for. Asks that Smith send a letter nominating his vice-presidents for the next year. He was in Scotland for 5 months last year.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir William Jackson Hooker
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Oct 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/23/10, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Apologises again for apparent attacks on Smith in "Flora Scotia", which he will correct in the next edition; thanks for mention of botanical errors, but still differs on matters of opinion, including: does not agree about 'Salix', maintains criticism of "English botany" figure of 'Aquilegia vulgaris', cannot credit Smith for his work on 'Mentha' due to space, took his ideas on sexes of 'Tussilago' from multiple authors. Most hurt that Smith believes rumours that John Lindley [(1799-1865)] was the principal author, explains his involvement.

From Smith's paper on 'Hypnum recognitum' in "Linnean Transactions" vol 13 presumes he has not seen his own account of 'Hypnum recognitum' in "Flora Londinensis". Concedes he made an error respecting 'Rubus chamaemorus'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir William Jackson Hooker
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
30 Nov 1824
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/23/11, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for botanical information in Smith's last letter, and for Smith's "friendly & affectionate manners". Unsure of [Joseph] Sabine's intentions in erroneously reporting John Lindley's [(1799-1865)] involvement in "Flora Scotia".

Discusses his proposed "Species plantarum" in English, which will neither be a translation of Candolle's "Prodromus" nor an entirely original work; details; will be able to profit from consulting Smith's "English Flora"; queries on terminology; encloses a specimen of the work; will not commence printing until his return from London and Paris in March.

Has not received Nepalese plants from [Nathaniel] Wallich except one collection sent 5 years ago, and now understands that the East India Company requires that they have the distribution of all the specimens, but he continues to receive mosses from Wallich. Pleased the Company sent Smith "so fine a parcel of ferns", thanks the 'Darea' from it, which he wishes to figure in his "Exotic flora". Encloses a "fern-like plant"; observations; wishes to name the genus after its discoverer, Mr Parker; asks if 'Pteris thalictroides' or 'Pteris cornuta' belong to same genus. He has established botanical correspondence with Demerara and St Vincent's; has mosses to send Smith; wishes to consult him about 'Orchideae', of which every new species forms a new genus.

Lists plants for his "Exotic flora", including 'Marcgravia umbellata', 'Cassytha filiformis', 'Cytinus hypocistus'; has two plates engraved of the nutmeg and two new 'Tillandsiae'; about to figure 'Artocarpus incisa' and 'A. integrifolia'. Discusses 'Lepraria iolithos'. Expects "great things" from the unexplored parts of North America, having sent two botanists to the north-west coast; one is to join Captain Franklin and return overland with him, and the other to explore the vicinity of the Columbia [River]; appointing a third to go with Captain Franklin and Dr Richardson on their expedition as far as Saskatchewan and to remain their two years; further details. [Francis] Hamilton and [Francis] Boott both enquired after Smith.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London