Search: Darwin, G. H. in correspondent 
letter in document-type 
No in transcription-available 
1870-1879 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 4160 of 169 items

From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 Oct 1877
Source of text:
DAR 162: 66
Summary:

Loss of water from leaf surfaces; action of a still air layer.

Proposal for CD’s LL.D.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[28 Oct 1877]
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 60–1
Summary:

Writes again about arrangements for the honorary degree ceremony.

Has been working on tides, which he is almost certain have altered the obliquity of the ecliptic.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
[after 28 Oct 1877]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 60
Summary:

Has given dates [for the Cambridge University honorary degree] to the Vice-Chancellor.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
21 Nov [1877]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 64
Summary:

Asks GHD to determine whether there are worm-castings in cloisters of [Neville?] Court.

Enjoyed his visit to Cambridge. Asks for newspaper account of the LL.D.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 Nov 1877
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 62
Summary:

Will look for worm-castings in the cloisters,

and will send CD items from the Cambridge papers on the honorary degree.

Has hit on a possible fallacy in W. Thomson’s theory of secular cooling of the earth.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[23 Nov 1877]
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 63
Summary:

Asks CD if he would like to sign GHD’s Royal Society proposal for membership.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
24 Nov [1877]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 65
Summary:

Thinks he had better not sign GHD’s paper [as a candidate for F.R.S.], since he obviously is no judge of the quality of his work.

Asks if Thomson did not overlook heat generated by the crushing and folding of strata during the refrigeration of the globe.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 Jan 1878
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 65
Summary:

Has been reading Samuel Haughton on geological time ["Notes on physical geology, no. III", Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 26 (1877): 534–46]. It is utter rubbish. Asks whether CD thinks GHD should write a critical note on the subject [see Nature 17 (1878): 509–10].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
3 Feb [1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 67
Summary:

CD at first thought GHD should not answer Haughton [see 10689], but Hooker thinks if no correction is made Haughton’s error will be quoted for 20 years. CD is now inclined to agree.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 9 May 1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 66
Summary:

Recounts some figures relating deaf-mutism and consanguineous marriages.

GHD has failed to be elected to the Royal Society.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
9 May [1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 68
Summary:

CD believes few or none have attributed deaf-mutism to consanguineous marriages.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[30 June 1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 67
Summary:

Is frustrated to see, from a paragraph in Nature [18 (1878): 242], that Charles Lagrange has got hold of the same sort of ideas as he has.

Erasmus is unwell.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
10 [July 1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 69
Summary:

Asks for sketches of [Thalia] pistil, in which he is much interested.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 11 July 1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 68
Summary:

Refers to Charles Lagrange, who is working on the same subject as GHD, but in a fundamentally different way.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
11 [July 1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 70
Summary:

Rejoices that "Lagrange’s case does not seem very bad".

CD is working hard at dissecting Thalia. Has recovered some handiness with microscope.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
12 July 1878
Source of text:
DAR 209.13: 14–15, DAR 210.2: 69
Summary:

Sends drawings of specimens [of Thalia] CD requested.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
13 [July 1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 71
Summary:

Thanks GHD for his drawings [of Thalia]. Some parts need attention.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
14 [July 1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 72
Summary:

Writes to say that the point on which he thought GHD’s drawings were mistaken proves to be an error in his own observation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
17 [Aug 1878]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 73
Summary:

He and Emma rejoice that GHD’s mathematical troubles are at an end. It is miraculous that he unconsciously followed the right course – like composing a sonata by a fluke.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
10 Oct 1878
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 70
Summary:

Recounts the experiments on Fechner’s law he has found in Helmholz; they are on the smallest perceptible differences of illumination. Describes how to test whether plants’ responses to lights are in accordance with it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail