Search: Hooker, J. D. in correspondent 
1850-1859::1856::08 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 13 of 3 items

From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
4 Aug 1856
Source of text:
DAR 100: 100–4
Summary:

JDH’s arguments against transmutation: 1. Plants do not show the confusion he would expect; 2. Under clearly similar physical conditions we do not find same species.

JDH’s argument against migration: commonality of alpine species. Believes migration opposes facts of botanical distribution in Van Diemen’s Land and New Zealand; prefers continental extension theory.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
5 Aug [1856]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 173
Summary:

Agrees that Lyell’s letters shed no new light on extensions issue. Continental extensions: opposes their being hypothesised all over world.

Commonality of alpine plants damns both extension and migration.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
7 Aug [1856]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 174
Summary:

Antarctic plants most difficult to account for on any theory. Lyell’s iceberg transportal of seeds.

Are there more representative species of American origin in Tristan da Cunha than in Kerguelen land?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail