Search: 1790-1799::1791 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 121140 of 165 items

From:
Thomas Pennant
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
15 Sep 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/8/21, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Hopes to give to Linnean Society the third editions of his "[Journey from Chester to] London", "Indian Zoology", and "History of Quadrupeds". Queries on Indian plants for the 11th folio volume of his "Outlines of the Globe": whether Linnaeus refers to the "Poon tree" used for masts; the "cotton tree" referred to by "Gerard p.1552" and "[Edward] Ives Voy[age] 478", thinks it a classical tree; asks if the common walking cane is made from a 'Rotang'; requests correct reference to correct a mistake in [Robert] Orme's "Fragments". Thanks for mention in Smith's essay on natural history [in "Linnean Transactions"] but upset to be coupled with "the dull Brisson" [Mathurin Jacques Brisson (1723-1806) French zoologist]. Requests list of the 20 most striking Indian plants or trees.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Pennant
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
20 Nov 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/8/22, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

References to "poon tree" of India in "Raii hist. 11. p. - & Ives's Voy[age] 46a", from which masts are made. Sends an oak leaf "filled with some matters" that Hugh Davies could not determine. Declines membership of Linnean Society but proposes his son David.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
John Pitchford
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
13 Jan 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/8/61, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Believes the specimens of [William] Hudson's 'Mentha villosa' he received from [Samuel] Goodenough are 'Mentha sylvestris', confirmed by Linnaeus and Ray in "Historiae plantarum"; further observations on it. Received 'Mentha sativa' from Bath from Goodenough, who believes Pitchford's garden 'M. satvia' is 'M. gentilis'. Confusion over figures of 'M. sylvestris' and other 'Mentha' species in "the old authors" Hudson, [John] Gerard [(1545-1612)], [John] Ray, and [John] Parkinson [(1567-1650)]. Has thirteen customers for [James] Sowerby's work [presumably "English Botany"], and one for [James] Dickson's "Plan[tarum] Crypt[ogamicarum]". Dickson sent him '[Acrostichum] ilvense', thinks it different from the Swedish specimen. Will consult [William] Sole on 'Mentha'. Received 'Sium repens' from Dr Randolph of Oxford, found by [John] Sibthorp, new to England, asks if it is also a new Linnaean one.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
John Pitchford
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 Feb 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/8/62, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Returns Smith's 'Mentha gentilis', believes it the plant of Linnaeus and wild although [Edmund] Davall not as as specific as he would wish, makes his own observations including reference to [John] Ray's "Hist[oriae plantarum]", only needs to see [Philip] Miller's 'M. gentilis' and 'M. sativa' specimens to complete his work. Observations on the 'M. corolla', believes it will help distinguish most species. Observations on Smith's notes of the different specimens: 'M. arvensis', 'M. sativa', 'M. sylvestris', 'M. rotundifolia', 'Menthiastic aquatici'; hopes [Samuel] Goodenough has conceded that his 'Mentha villosa' is 'M. sylvestris'; further observations on these in postscript. Explains errors is Fuschius' figures. Thanks Smith for specimen of 'Schoenus ferrugineus'. Miller's 'Mentha gentilis'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Dorothy Bentinck
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
[1791]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/8/66, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks Smith for gift, glad the print she sent via [Samuel] Goodenough was acceptable.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Dorothy Bentinck
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
17 Jul [1791]
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/8/67, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

The Duke of Portland [William Cavendish-Bentinck, 3rd Duke of Portland (1738-1809)] and herself invite Smith to Bulstrode, [Samuel] Goodenough is also there.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Eduard Sandifort
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Oct 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/4, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for books, requests succeeding volumes in due course and English description for collection of coloured illustrations. His account with Smith. Asks after the illustrations of Xaempsori produced by [Sir Joseph] Banks, which he previously requested. Requests copies of "Linnean Transactions", though he is not a member of the Linnean Society.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Dietrich Heinrich Stoever
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
8 Oct 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/72, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Moved to write to Smith on account of his "glorious reputation" and his "benevolent and friendly spirit". He has been working on a biography of Linnaeus for the last three years; requests response from Smith on several questions regarding the purchase of the Linnaean collections, as several unconfirmed or false tales are circulating: 1. what price did Smith pay and in which year; 2. what did the purchase include; 3. asks if Smith is producing new editions of "Species plantarum" and "Systema naturae", as reported in French edition of Pulteney's "General view of the writings of Linnaeus", and whether Smith has published anything else based on Linnaeus' collections; 4. requests one or two memorable letters from Linnaeus' correspondence; 5. asks after foundation of the Linnean Society.

News of Linnaeus' widow and daughters. A monument to Linnaeus to be erected in front of the Uppsala Academy's new garden, at royal expense. His friend, Professor Giseke of Hamburg, is to publish Linnaeus' "Praelectiones in ordines naturales plantarum"

Also a page taken from "Benlag; zu des Hamburgischen unparthenischen Correspondenten" no. 160, dated 7 Oct 1791, in German.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
David Murray
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
13 Dec 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/73, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for letter and pamphlet of Smith's "Introductory Discourse" from the first volume of "Linnean Transactions".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Olof Peter Swartz
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
16 Jul 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/81, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for election as FMLS. Sending a copy of his "Prodromus".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Olof Peter Swartz
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
27 Nov 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/82, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for "Linnean Transactions". Hopes Smith and Sir Joseph Banks have received the copies of his "Prodromus". Missed Smith whilst he was visiting England. Defends himself against not having mentioned Smith in the preface of his "Prodromus" by stating he consulted the duplicates in Carl Linnaeus junior's herbarium and other collections connected with Linnaeus including Dr Dahl's, same applies to his "Obervationes", a copy of which he has sent to Smith. Warns Smith of possible errors in the 'Cryptogamic' section of Linnaeus' herbarium as many were collected by himself, states an error noticed by [James] Dickson. Long list of desiderata [on second folio, some names have a pencilled tick against them]. Asks for Smith's observations on enclosed 'Carex' specimens [not extant].

[Smith has noted on verso of second folio] "if my friend Mr Afzelius should be met with, to beg to be remembered to him".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Richard Pulteney
Date:
9 Dec 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/MS238/10, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for Pulteney's letter of 4 [Dec 1791] and bill. Discusses arrival of remaining prints for first volume of Cavanilles' ["Icones et descriptiones plantarum quae aut sponte in Hispania crescunt"]. Gaertner dead, unclear if his 5 remaining "Centuriae" will be published. Laments death of Dr Pictairn, said that his collection will be sold.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Pierre Marie Auguste Broussonet
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
16 Sep 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/124, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for memoirs. News of French botanists. La Société Royale d'Agriculture.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Richard Pulteney
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 May 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/MS238/7, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

[Draft or copy]

Apologises for delay in replyigng to Smith's letter of 22 October [1790], caused by a severe indisposition all winter. Thanks for Smith's remarks on his book. Responds to points in Smith's letter: Plukenet's authority, John Ray's manuscripts, difficulty of his acquiring books.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Richard Pulteney
Date:
5 Aug 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/MS238/8, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Would have replied to Pulteney's letter of 24 May [1791] sooner had the enclosed "Linnean Transactions" vol 1 arrived earlier. "Quite out of patience" with waiting for L'Héritier's recent publications; offers to send Pulteney's sketches to him. Discussion of recent publications, including by Allioni, Cavanilles, Hedwig, Schreber, and Labillardière.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir James Edward Smith
To:
Richard Pulteney
Date:
15 Oct 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/MS238/9, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sends books and account of money owing to him. Keen for Pulteney to publish in "Linnean Transactions". Just returned from a trip to Lord Lewisham's [George Legge] in Kent to see 'Convolvulus speciosus'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Pierre Marie Auguste Broussonet
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
1 Nov 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/125, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

His brother studying medicine in England.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Johan Gustaf Acrel
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
30 Mar 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/19, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sending small parcel of works to Smith by same captain who delivered Linnaean collectionns; difficulties of sending items from here. Apolgises for sending [Carl] Thunberg's dissertations bound, thus incurring heavy duties; rarity of this work, unable to get copy for Dr [Smithson] Tennant [(1761-1815), chemist].

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Adam Afzelius
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
18 Aug 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/23, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Returned Smith's books except Linnaeus' "Scanian Journey". Has been travelling for 10 weeks with Sir George, keeping a journal and collecting, but now detained by Sir George's gout. Has possibly found new cryptogamical plants and has gathered many 'Fucus' with fruitifications.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Carlo Allioni
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Sep 1791
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/41, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Thanks for dried plants sent by Smith. Will send Smith whatever he thinks may be of interest from his own collection. Expresses the Turin Academy's delight at having acquired Smith as a foreign member.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
Correspondent
Document type
Transcription available