Search: 1850-1859::1858 in date 
letter in document-type 
Cambridge University Library in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 4160 of 158 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
10 [Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 227
Summary:

Heartened that tabulations of small and large genera done in different ways yield good results. JDH has done some tabulations but has not followed CD’s method of getting equal numbers of small and large genera.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
11 Mar [1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 228
Summary:

JDH’s "objection" that small local genera do not vary and mundane ones do, is exactly CD’s point. Local floras useful to test idea that varieties are incipient species. Same genus in different countries cannot be lumped.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[14 Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 104: 182–5
Summary:

Summary of JDH’s objections to CD’s survey of floras and conclusion that large genera vary more than small.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
16 [Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 229
Summary:

Thanks JDH for his objections; will respond by sending fair copy of MS when written.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Hewett Cottrell Watson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 Mar 1858
Source of text:
DAR 98: A23–4
Summary:

Discusses the ranges of species in large and small genera; difficulties involved in limiting the discussion to Britain.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
31 Mar [1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 230
Summary:

Writing section on large and small genera [for Natural selection, ch. 4].

Huxley supersedes Owen on parthenogenesis.

Buckle’s History of civilisation in England extremely interesting.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Asa Gray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 3 Apr 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 165: 103
Summary:

List of close species taken from AG’s Manual of botany [1848].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Leonard Jenyns; Leonard Blomefield
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 18 Apr 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 45: 20–4
Summary:

[Copy of some rough notes.] References about species. Variations within species.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
10 Apr [1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 231
Summary:

Asa Gray’s criticism of Buckle and his comments on large and small genera.

CD suspects glacial epoch immensely long. Rates of organic change too variable to make them a good measure of geological time.

Bees’ cells are a difficulty for theory.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Hallowes Miller
Date:
[15 Apr 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 181: 24a
Summary:

A set of questions CD prepared for his meeting with WHM to discuss the geometry of bees’ cells.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Robert Waterhouse
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Apr 1858
Source of text:
DAR 181
Summary:

Bees’ cells; GRW thinks hexagonal shape is accidental. Encloses notes on cells of Icaria.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Emma Wedgwood; Emma Darwin
Date:
[28 Apr 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 210.8: 34
Summary:

CD recounts an idyllic stroll and nap – "as pleasant a rural scene as ever I saw, and I did not care one penny how any of the beasts or birds had been formed".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
26 [Apr 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 232
Summary:

Confidential revelation concerning W. F. Daniell.

Georg Hartung confirms CD’s supposition from flora of Azores that icebergs had been stranded there.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
[26 Apr 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 210.6: 24
Summary:

Has been at Moor Park since Tuesday. Is passing his time watching ants.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
[26 May 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 210.6: 27
Summary:

Has come to heavy grief about bees’ cells, unless Huber is wrong [François Huber, New observations on the natural history of bees, new ed. (1841)].

Discusses cart-horses and stripes on a Belgiman [Belgian?].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
[20 June 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 210.6: 28
Summary:

Relates domestic affairs.

Thinks his bees’ cell theory will hold good.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
[3 May 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 210.6: 25
Summary:

Discusses bees’ cells

and WED’s botanical interests.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
6 May [1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 234
Summary:

Sends MS on large and small genera.

Observed slave-making ants at Moor Park.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Hallowes Miller
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[14 May 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 48: B1b
Summary:

[Six fragments, mainly diagrams.] The geometry of bees’ cells.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
14 [May 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 210.6: 26
Summary:

Relates events at home;

hopes WED gets the scholarship.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail