Search: 1860-1869::1863::03 in date 
letter in document-type 
No in transcription-available 
Sorted by:

Showing 2140 of 99 items

From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[6 Mar 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 101: 114–16
Summary:

Lyell’s position on mutability.

Directions for care of hothouse plants.

Falconer hostile to Lyell’s book.

JDH’s Wedgwood ware collection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Darwin Fox
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
12 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 164: 178
Summary:

Discusses crossed varieties of sheep and ducks.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
Date:
12–13 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.290)
Summary:

[On Antiquity of man] CD is "convinced that at times … you have … given up immutability". "A clear expression from you, if you could have given it, would have been potent with the public."

Objects to CL’s description of CD’s view "as a modification of Lamarck’s doctrine". Quotes Henrietta [Darwin]’s observations on this description.

Comments on CL’s controversy with Owen concerning the human brain.

The controversy between Falconer and CL.

The "wretched" review of CL [Antiquity of man, Athenæum 14 Feb 1863, pp. 219–21] and Huxley [Man’s place in nature].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
13 [Mar 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 186
Summary:

Lyell’s position on mutability.

Fertilisation of trees by bees.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[15 Mar 1863]
Source of text:
DAR 101: 117–20
Summary:

JDH battling with Lyell over treatment of species question in Antiquity of man. Distressed by Lyell’s raising false priority issue between JDH and CD. Falconer involved in a priority squabble.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 Mar 1863
Source of text:
K. M. Lyell ed. 1881, 2: 364–6
Summary:

Lyell has received compliments for letting readers draw own inferences [on species question]. Now feels he earlier did Lamarck injustice. [CD’s] substitution of variety-making power for volition [as in Lamarck] in some respects only a change of names.

Thinks Huxley taking on too many responsibilities.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas White Woodbury
Date:
15 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
B. Altman & Co. ( New York Times , 12 October 1975, p. 39)
Summary:

TWW should look at bee and comb specimens received by CD from Africa.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences
Date:
16 Mar 1863
Source of text:
Archiv der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (II–III–120: 67)
Summary:

Thanks Academy on his election as a Corresponding Member.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Darwin Fox
Date:
16 [Mar 1863]
Source of text:
Christ’s College Library, Cambridge (MS 53 Fox 137)
Summary:

If WDF should hear what ram was put to the ewes, CD would like to add it [see Variation 2: 30].

Will add "cautiously" that WDF believes white and slate muscovy ducks breed true [Variation 2: 40].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
James Paget, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 Mar 1863
Source of text:
DAR 174: 5
Summary:

Sends two [unidentified] papers on inheritance of medical malformations. Suggests that besides the inheritance of specific variations, the tendency to show variations in the same organ system (stomach, nervous, etc.) may also be inherited.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Roland Trimen
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 Mar 1863
Source of text:
DAR 70: 180, DAR 178: 184
Summary:

RT has sent his observations on orchids to CD. Has found only one case of an insect with a pollinium adhering to it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
Date:
17 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.291)
Summary:

His better opinion [of work of Boucher de Perthes].

Explains his position on CL’s treatment of species.

Mentions positive response to his ideas on the part of a German professor [Ernst Haeckel], Alphonse de Candolle, and a botanical palaeontologist [Gaston de Saporta].

Notes negative reaction of entomologists.

Mentions Falconer’s objections [to Antiquity].

Mentions work of Hooker.

Comments on paper by Owen ["On the aye-aye", Rep. BAAS 32 (1862) pt 2: 114–16]

and CD’s review of Bates’s paper [Collected papers 2: 87–92].

Thinks Natural History Review is excellent.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
17 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 187
Summary:

Lyell’s Antiquity of man lacks originality.

Statements in Lyell provoke CD to determine exact publication date of Origin and JDH’s introductory essay [to Flora Tasmaniae].

CD now believes in repeated periods of global cooling and migration.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Thomas White Woodbury
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Mar 1863
Source of text:
DAR 181: 150
Summary:

Bee species of different sizes build cells the same size.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas White Woodbury
Date:
[after 17 Mar 1863]
Source of text:
International Bee Research Association, Eva Crane Library
Summary:

Thanks for the artificial comb.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Asa Gray
Date:
20 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
Gray Herbarium of Harvard University (58)
Summary:

Discusses the meaning of C. K. Sprengel’s term "dichogamy". Dichogamous plants are functionally monoecious; Primula is functionally dioecious.

Reports Hermann Crüger’s observations of Cattleya and of bees pollinating Catasetum. Crüger will observe Melastomataceae.

Has built a hothouse.

Fears Amsinckia cannot be dimorphic.

Ill health slows his work on Variation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Alfred Newton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Mar 1863
Source of text:
DAR 172: 39
Summary:

Sends tuber of Chilean wild potato, requested through Hooker and P. L. Sclater.

Plans to exhibit a bird’s foot with a large ball of clay attached. This phenomenon supports CD on seed dispersal.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
DAR 177: 85
Summary:

Thanks for CD’s answers on Passiflora

and Asa Gray review.

Has observed gradation of sterility in Oncidium species.

Has observed rostellar germination and fertilisation in Laelia. The latter was prevented in Bletia by covering the stigma with plaster of Paris.

Gongora atropurpurea capsules are swelling.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Asa Gray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22–30 Mar 1863
Source of text:
DAR 165: 131
Summary:

Discusses the Duke of Argyll’s article on the supernatural [Edinburgh Rev. 116 (1862): 378–97].

Has heard that the Incas married their sisters; this may be worth investigating as a case of inbreeding.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Darwin Fox
Date:
23 Mar [1863]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.292)
Summary:

Thanks WDF for authentic details of number and colour of lambs [Variation 2: 30].

Complains of his eczema.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Document type
Transcription available