Search: 1880-1889::1881::11 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 2140 of 126 items

From:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
2 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 178: 85
Summary:

Encloses his review of Earthworms.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Julius Victor Carus
Date:
2 Nov 1881
Source of text:
Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz (Slg. Darmstaedter Lc 1859: Darwin, Charles, Bl. 193–194)
Summary:

Sends corrections ("two bad errata & a blunder") in Earthworms, which is selling well in England.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Sydney Howard Vines
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
2 Nov [1881]
Source of text:
DAR 180: 6
Summary:

On the action of ammonium carbonate on plant cells. "Aggregation" of protoplasm.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles-Ferdinand Reinwald
Date:
2 Nov 1881
Source of text:
David Schulson (dealer) (Catalogue 43)
Summary:

Errata discovered in Earthworms are listed. Large sales in England, but this is no indication for France. [See 13510.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Foster Barham Zincke
Date:
3 Nov 1881
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.)
Summary:

CD thinks the celts [prehistoric tools] on the pan could not have been buried wholly by worms.

As for large size of Arctic mammals, CD suggests it is an advantage in retaining warmth.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
Date:
3 Nov 1881
Source of text:
Archives of the New York Botanical Garden (Charles Finney Cox Collection)
Summary:

Thanks for the review [of Earthworms].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles James (Charles) Layton; D. Appleton & Co
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 159: 110
Summary:

Encloses statement of US sales of CD’s works and sends a cheque for the balance due to CD.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
James Frederick Simpson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
4 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 177: 167
Summary:

Relates some of his observations on the behaviour and activity of earthworms.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Sydney Howard Vines
Date:
4 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 185: 76
Summary:

Thanks SHV for his letter [13455] in answer to his questions about the action of ammonium carbonate on the root cells of Euphorbia peplus. Suggests further observations.

Has read J. Sachs [Textbook of botany, English translation (1875)] and H. A. De Bary [Vergleichende Anatomie (1877)] on milk-tubes. He believes that tubes he has observed in germinating roots of Euphorbia myrsinites are modified milk tubes. Will send a paper on the subject to the Linnean Society.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Robert Francis Cooke; John Murray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
5 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 171: 523
Summary:

Memorandum: "3500 Worms!!!" sold at annual sale; 117 Movement in plants; 180 "Naturalist" [Journal of researches]; 600 Origin; 320 Descent.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Henry Farrer, 1st baronet and 1st Baron Farrer
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
5 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 164: 104
Summary:

Has received Earthworms.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Lawrence John Jones, 4th baronet
Date:
6 Nov 1881
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.600)
Summary:

Explains source of error [in Earthworms].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Lubbock, 4th baronet and 1st Baron Avebury
Date:
6 Nov 1881
Source of text:
The British Library (Add MS 49645: 104–5)
Summary:

Supports the statements on Henry Hicks in JL’s address.

Bonney is an "objector general".

CD has always supported A. C. Ramsay.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Wilhelm Friedrich Philipp (Wilhelm) Pfeffer
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 174: 39
Summary:

It is impossible to trace the direct connections between stimuli and responses in plant movements. Disagrees with much of Julius von Wiesner [Die Bewegungsvermögen der Pflanzen (1881)]. Disagrees with CD on induced movements and circumnutation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Mellard Reade
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 176: 32
Summary:

Praise for Earthworms.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Robert Francis Cooke; John Murray
Date:
6 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 143: 297
Summary:

Discusses additional printing of Earthworms.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Anthony Elly Graves
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 165: 91
Summary:

Sends his observations on the behaviour of a worm. They seem to indicate some sensory apparatus enabling it to "see".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Foster Barham Zincke
Date:
7 Nov 1881
Source of text:
Cleveland Health Sciences Library (Robert M. Stecher collection)
Summary:

Would like to cite the case of the celt in a new printing of Earthworms. Asks for details.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles James Breese
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 160: 289
Summary:

Sends CD an abstract of his 1871 paper on the earthworm, and requests information on the phenomenon of luminosity.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Sarah Marshall
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 171: 43
Summary:

Can CD explain why in a mollusc (Bulimus decollatus) immature forms are always broken at the apex.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Document type
Transcription available