Search: 1880-1889::1881::11 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 4160 of 126 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Nature
Date:
7 Nov [1881]
Source of text:
Nature , 17 November 1881, p. 51
Summary:

Summarises letter of William Nation [13350]. The facts given strongly support the conclusion that there is some close connection between the parasitic habits of birds that lay their eggs in others’ nests and the fact of their laying eggs at "considerable intervals of time".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Mellard Reade
Date:
8 Nov 1881
Source of text:
University of Liverpool Library (TMR1.D.7.8)
Summary:

"Roots often run down worm burrows, but can penetrate the ground without such aid."

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Foster Barham Zincke
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 184: 13
Summary:

Describes the soil in which he found prehistoric tools.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
James Frederick Simpson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 177: 168
Summary:

Thanks CD for his letter and gives permission to use his observations, although not considering himself a worthy authority. Enlarges upon some of his previous observations.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Anthony Elly Graves
Date:
9 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 144: 347
Summary:

Cannot explain worm behaviour observed by AEG. Cannot believe in power of vision. Inclined to speculate on capacity for distinguishing damp air.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Francis Darwin
Date:
9 Nov [1881]
Source of text:
DAR 211: 70, DAR 211: 89
Summary:

Comments on two letters received from W. F. P. Pfeffer [13425, 13464] who thinks Julius Wiesner’s view that light, etc. acts directly on plants is wrong.

Is frantic over the number of letters received about worms; feels the enthusiasm of the reception of Earthworms is laughable.

Is confounded by Euphorbia rootlets and has re-examined the effect of carbonate of ammonia.

Has thought of three good experiments to oppose Wiesner.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Johann August Georg Edmund (Edmund) Mojsisovics von Mojsvár
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
10 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 171: 228
Summary:

Thanks for Earthworms.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Julius Frazelle Galbraith
Date:
11 Nov 1881
Source of text:
Bonhams, New York (dealers) (21 September 2015)
Summary:

Explains that the animals in the cask cannot have developed from the wheat.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Julius Wiesner
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
11 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 261.11: 22 (EH 88206074)
Summary:

CD has misunderstood his views on heliotropism. Agrees that his experiments on the movement of root tips are weak. Will conduct further research. Thinks that since mechanical conception of botany is not so widespread, those who agree with CD probably are in majority.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
12 Nov 1881
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.601)
Summary:

Discusses GJR’s controversy with the Duke [of Argyll] concerning Roux’s book [Der Kampf der Theile im Organismus (1881)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
12 Nov [1881]
Source of text:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Thiselton-Dyer, W. T., Letters from Charles Darwin 1873–81: ff. 228–9)
Summary:

Progress of his and Frank Darwin’s work; "all natural science seems now to depend on section-cutting".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Johann Friedrich Theodor (Fritz) Müller
Date:
13 Nov 1881
Source of text:
The British Library (Loan MS 10 no 56)
Summary:

Is experimenting with effect of ammonium carbonate on chlorophyll and roots, but finds the results confusing.

Julius von Wiesner has published a book reinterpreting CD’s observations in Movement in plants [see 13422].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
James Charles Clutterbuck
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
13 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 161: 181
Summary:

Describes earthworms moving to the surface to escape moles.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Pitt Taylor
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
14 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 178: 55
Summary:

Thinks CD overestimates earthworms’ role in creating mould. Gives some observations on worms and questions about their breeding habits.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Archibald Geikie
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
14 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 165: 27
Summary:

Thanks CD for offer of assistance in exploration of Eskdale beds. Describes finds of scorpions and unusual amphibians.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Francis Darwin
Date:
14 Nov [1881]
Source of text:
DAR 211: 90
Summary:

Forwards a letter from W. F. P. Pfeffer, who opposes some of Julius Wiesner’s notions on plant movements.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Francis Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[after 14 Nov 1881]
Source of text:
DAR 274.1: 68
Summary:

Thanks for two letters from Pfeffer. Will return translation of Pfeffer and send a letter from Elfring. Looking forward to working on "antiWiesner" experiments. Will return on 26th or 27th.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Robert Smith Bartleet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 160: 52
Summary:

Has read Earthworms.

Wonders if CD has studied gnats; inquires about their apparently useless hovering over one spot for hours.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Sydney Howard Vines
Date:
15 Nov 1881
Source of text:
DAR 185: 77
Summary:

More observations of the radicles of germinating seeds of Euphorbia peplus for appearance of milk-tubes.

Comments on J. v. Wiesner’s and W. F. P. Pfeffer’s views and criticism of his experiments.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
16 Nov 1881
Source of text:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Darwin: Letters to Thiselton-Dyer, 1873–81: ff. 231–2)
Summary:

Would be grateful for some Euphorbia species for examination of the roots. "The subject is by no means worth all the labour I am bestowing on it, but I cannot bear to be beaten."

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Document type
Transcription available