Search: Darwin, C. R. in addressee 
Darwin Correspondence Project in contributor 
1870-1879::1875 in date 
Cambridge University Library in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 81100 of 297 items

From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 47
Summary:

CD’s suspicions that Legrain falsified experiments on interbred rabbits are like second sight. Has sent a copy of the letter to A. H. Huth.

Henry Sidgwick and A. J. Balfour are "spiritualising" again.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Adolf Ludwig (William) Marshall
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 171: 49
Summary:

Doubts ostrich descended from reptiles. Its ancestors true birds. Of course, all birds descended from reptiles. Compares foetus of birds to that of reptiles.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Ferdinand Julius Cohn
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 161: 200
Summary:

Acknowledges presentation copy of Insectivorous plants.

Studying Drosera on vacation in Bohemia. Thinks CD has erred in considering "aggregation" to have occurred in the protoplasm. Suggests it is result of exosmosis of vacuole.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hensleigh Wedgwood
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[22 Aug 1875]
Source of text:
DAR 86: B32
Summary:

Errata in first edition of Insectivorous plants.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Arthur Gardiner Butler
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 99: 90–1
Summary:

"The moth is rightly named Ophideres Fullonica." Gives its range, family, allied European and British species, etc.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Robert Francis Cooke; John Murray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 171: 466
Summary:

The two volumes of Variation [2d ed.] are unequal in size. Can CD reduce vol. 2 and increase vol. 1?

Does CD wish to publish Climbing plants [2d ed.] at once?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Edward Arnott Clowes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 171: 467
Summary:

R. Cooke has complained about the size of paper on which proofs are printed. He does not know that CD requested a larger size. Asks CD what should be done.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Ferdinand Julius Cohn
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 86: B3–4
Summary:

Clarifies his thoughts on "aggregation" in Drosera.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Robert Francis Cooke; John Murray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 171: 468
Summary:

Apologises for the annoyance caused about the size of proof paper. Clears up misunderstanding. As for Climbing plants, RC thinks no less than 1500 copies of a book by CD should be printed.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Samuel Newington
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 172: 34
Summary:

Reports a competition between the air roots of two varieties of grapevines. The victor changed the flavour and shape of the loser’s fruit.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Rolleston
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 147: 554
Summary:

Sends copy of his "Address [to the department of anthropology", Rep. BAAS 45 (1875): 142–56].

Notes criticism of remark by Walter Bagehot dealing with extinction of barbarians [cited in Descent 1: 239].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Fayrer, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
31 Aug 1875
Source of text:
DAR 164: 114
Summary:

Sends a copy of his book [The royal tiger of Bengal (1875)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Samuel Newington
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
2 Sept 1875
Source of text:
DAR 172: 35
Summary:

Tells CD of his many experiments on interarching vines, potato tubers, exudation of carbon dioxide from roots,

and the synchrony of the pulse and the step while walking.

Would like to meet CD.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Andrew John Stuart, 6th Earl Castlestewart
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
2 Sept 1875
Source of text:
DAR 177: 268
Summary:

Has observed a dun pony with black stripes.

Intends breeding native fowls and will happily furnish CD with any information he can.

Discusses the domestication of animals.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Robert Francis Cooke; John Murray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Sept 1875
Source of text:
DAR 171: 469
Summary:

Since the new edition of Variation will be stereotyped, Murray’s will always have means to provide plates if they are wanted in America.

Explains their way of sending proofs for authors who want wide margins for corrections.

Thinks it better to keep Climbing plants for the annual trade sale.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Ferdinand Jamison Morphy
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Sept 1875
Source of text:
DAR 171: 243
Summary:

Reports a hybrid ram and sow, the cuino of Mexico, which is very common and fertile.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Robert Lawson (Lawson) Tait
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Sept [1875]
Source of text:
DAR 178: 18
Summary:

RLT speculates on the "moral nature" of parental protection shown by humans and traces it back to its first occurrence in the animal world.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Francis Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[1 Sept 1875 or later]
Source of text:
DAR 274.1: 32
Summary:

Proofs have come. It will be jolly coming down to Southampton.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Federico Delpino
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
11 Sept 1875
Source of text:
DAR 162: 154
Summary:

Thanks for Thomas Belt’s Naturalist in Nicaragua [1874], which confirms some of his observations,

and for Insectivorous plants, which he praises.

Suggests that a book integrating knowledge of plant–animal interactions be written by a Darwinist.

Defines biology as the science of external interactions.

German reception is far more positive than Italian.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Mary Catherine Sackville-West, countess of Derby; Mary Catherine Gascoyne-Cecil, countess of Derby; Mary Catherine Stanley, countess of Derby
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
14 Sept 1875
Source of text:
DAR 162: 167
Summary:

Thanks CD for telling her "such exact truth". She saw Thomas Carlyle at Keston – the country air has done him good – "he is half sorry to have been so unsociable on his first arrival".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project