Search: Darwin, C. R. in addressee 
Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
1860-1869::1868::02 in date 
letter in document-type 
Sorted by:

Showing 4160 of 81 items

From:
George Brettingham Sowerby, Jr
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 82: A55–6
Summary:

Sends data from J. G. Jeffreys on the form of shells of the sexes of Mollusca. [See Descent 1: 324, 326.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Farr
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 164: 29
Summary:

Will gladly supply any information he can. Sends Registrar General’s reports; will inquire about the animals.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Blackwall
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A2–3
Summary:

Proportion of sexes in spiders; coloration.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Henry Walter Bates
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A4–5
Summary:

Has put question of proportion of sexes in insects to the Entomological Society. Quotes H. T. Stainton and F. Smith. Cites some cases mentioned by other members.

Is reading Variation; does not quite understand Pangenesis.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Johann Xaver Robert (Robert) Caspary
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 76: B173–4
Summary:

Discusses the flowers of, and cross- and self-fertilisation in, certain aquatic plants. Gives cases of dichogamy and perfect self-fertility.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Edward Wilson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
19 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 181: 123
Summary:

Encloses letter (not found) from Australian friend responding to CD’s queries on expression.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Owen Waterhouse
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
19 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 82: A76–7
Summary:

Coloration of blind beetles.

Sizes of sexes in Taphroderes.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Sweetland Dallas
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
19 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 162: 14
Summary:

The Athenæum article [review of Variation, 15 Feb 1868, pp. 243–4] is a disgrace.

WSD will keep CD’s queries about Hemiptera in mind. Secondary sexual characters are certainly more marked in exotic than in British species.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
William Henty
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 166: 181, 183
Summary:

Has read CD’s inquiry about proportional numbers of males and females born to domestic animals [see 5863] and outlines his theory regarding the factors determining the sex of offspring.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Lubbock, 4th baronet and 1st Baron Avebury
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 170: 63
Summary:

Found [Variation] full of interest. Has not yet made up his mind about Pangenesis; wants to hear what can be said against it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Roland Trimen
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 85: B59–60a
Summary:

Proportion of sexes in butterflies; discussion of subject at meeting of Entomological Society, London.

Attraction of males by female Lasiocampa quercus. [see Descent 1: 311–12.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Henry Tibbats Stainton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A6–7
Summary:

Sends a preliminary reply to CD’s query [5890]. Ten males to one female among captured micro-Lepidoptera. Six females to four or five males in those he has bred. HTS is aware this is diametrically opposed to information from [Alexander] Wallace and Bates, but the true proportion of sexes can only be ascertained by breeding.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John William Douglas
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 81: 87
Summary:

Notes on sexual differences in British Hemiptera.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Henry Walter Bates
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 82: A32–3
Summary:

Comments on J. O. Westwood’s entomological nomenclature.

Discusses the organs for stridulation in Orthoptera [see Descent 1: 352ff].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Robert McLachlan
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: A8–9, DAR 82: A88–9
Summary:

On numerical proportions of sexes in insects; coloration. Dimorphism in dragonflies (Agrion) in which usual coloration is reversed in sexes [see Descent 1: 362–4].

Wallace seems to ride his hobby too hard.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Edward Wilson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 181: 124
Summary:

CD’s queries on expression.

Sends photo of a native Australian.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
William Sweetland Dallas
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 162: 15
Summary:

Has sent his translations [of parts of Theodor Piderit, System der Mimik und Physiognomik (1867)].

Fritz Müller’s Für Darwin [1864] would sell if well translated. WSD would be glad to undertake it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Heinrich Ludwig Hermann (Hermann) Müller
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[after 23 Feb 1868]
Source of text:
DAR 171: 292
Summary:

HM is certain his brother Fritz would like to see Für Darwin translated into English by Dallas. He will make arrangements with the German publisher.

Two friends are writing Darwinian works: Adolf Speyer on phylogeny of Lepidoptera

and August Röse on genealogy of mosses.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Asa Gray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 165: 161
Summary:

AG is writing notice of American edition of Variation [Nation 6 (1868): 234–6].

Pangenesis is "as good an hypothesis as one can now make".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 106: B70–2, DAR 86: A10–11
Summary:

Responds to CD’s queries on polygamy in birds and orang.

Discusses sexual selection and secondary characters; colours and sexual preference.

Expresses his admiration for Pangenesis; it is superior to Herbert Spencer’s theory.

ARW differs somewhat with CD’s chapter on causes of variability [ch. 22 in Variation]. Thinks several of CD’s arguments are unsound.

Briefly discusses how natural selection might aid in producing sterility between allied species.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail