Search: Henslow, George in addressee 
1860-1869::1866::06 in date 
No in transcription-available 
Sorted by:

Showing 12 of 2 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Henslow
Date:
12 June [1866]
Source of text:
Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge (GEN/D/DARWIN (C)/9)
Summary:

Returns proofs of GH’s paper ["On hybridization among plants", Pop. Sci. Rev. 5 (1866): 304–13] with his criticisms. Prefers that GH not state that CD has read the proofs.

Does C. V. Naudin really say that ovules (not seed) of hybrid Luffa and Cucumis are imperfect?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Henslow
Date:
15 [June 1866]
Source of text:
DAR Library: tipped into George Henslow’s copy of Variation
Summary:

CD believes most strongly in reversion. J. G. Kölreuter’s, K. F. v Gärtner’s, and some of Charles Naudin’s cases leave no doubt in his mind. Forgets whether Herbert gave cases but in conversation he certainly believed in it. Thinks Gärtner is right to say reversion occurs only rarely in plant hybrids which have not been cultivated. [See 5120.]

Variation

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project