Search: Darwin, C. R. in author 
1840-1849::1849::02 in date 
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge in repository 
No in transcription-available 
Sorted by:

Showing 13 of 3 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
Date:
[4 Feb 1849]
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

HES’s arguments are of great weight, but CD cannot yet bring himself to reject well-known names for obscure ones. Sends four cases that he thinks will stagger HES. Cites his problems in classifying cirripedes. CD cannot bear to give new names, yet may do wrong to attach old ones. Not one species is correctly defined. The harm done by "species mongers".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
Date:
10 Feb [1849]
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

HES’s letter will fructify to some extent: CD will try to be more faithful to rigid virtue and priority. Would not adopt his own notion in cirripede book without prior approval by others. Will not append "Darwin" to any of his species. Feels sure many others share his aversion.

Asks HES’s opinion on retention of generic name Conchoderma.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
Date:
[19 Feb 1849]
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

Thanks HES for solving his problem. Has some difficulty with HES’s type-species. In arranging genera in a natural order it is often impossible to say which species should be considered the type.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project