Search: Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
1860-1869::1864 in date 
letter in document-type 
Cambridge University Library in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 6180 of 279 items

From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
19 Mar 1864
Source of text:
DAR 177: 102
Summary:

On fertilisation of Gongora.

His work on peloric Antirrhinum, Passiflora, and Verbascum, done at CD’s suggestion, is at CD’s disposal.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
William Erasmus Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 Mar [1864]
Source of text:
DAR 108: 86–7, 175–7
Summary:

Sends drawings of the pollen from Chinese Primula plants with styles and pistils of different lengths; observations on sizes and condition of their pollen.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
26[–7] Mar [1864]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 225
Summary:

John Scott has left Edinburgh Botanic Garden.

Asks JDH to ask Tyndall whether Frankland exaggerates the effect of snowfall on advance of European glaciers.

Huxley and Falconer squabble too much in public.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Scott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 Mar 1864
Source of text:
DAR 177: 103
Summary:

Surprised at CD’s account of Bryanthus.

H. Crüger’s approach to Gongora fertilisation is beset with difficulties.

Reports his work on self-sterility of Oncidium.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
29 Mar 1864
Source of text:
DAR 101: 193–7
Summary:

John Scott’s career.

Huxley’s vicious attack on anthropologists.

Critique of Joseph Prestwich’s theory of rivers.

Bitter feelings between the Hookers and the Veitch family of nurserymen.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Newton
Date:
29 Mar [1864]
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library (MS Add. 9839/1D/54)
Summary:

Eighty-two plants have germinated from earth on wounded partridge’s foot.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Lydia Ernestine Becker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 Mar 1864
Source of text:
DAR 160: 112
Summary:

Sends CD a copy of her book [Botany for novices (1864?)], intended to encourage the young, especially ladies, to study nature.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Daniel Oliver
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[1 Apr 1864]
Source of text:
DAR 157.2: 106
Summary:

References to and résumés of articles on climbing plants.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
[1 Apr 1864]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 226a–b
Summary:

Proposes to support John Scott in research on relative fertility and self-incompatibility of plants. CD would pay him for a year or two but wants JDH to give him research facilities at Kew.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Newton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
2 Apr 1864
Source of text:
DAR 172: 41
Summary:

Marvels that seeds from the lump of clay on the partridge’s foot have germinated. At Zoological Society [J. E.?] Gray ridiculed him. Now Frank Buckland would like to see the specimen.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[4 Apr 1864]
Source of text:
DAR 101: 202
Summary:

JDH has written to J. H. Balfour for a character reference for John Scott.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Robert Swinhoe
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
4 Apr 1864
Source of text:
DAR 205.2 (Letters): 254–5
Summary:

Reports on a strange breed of sheep at Aden,

a Brazilian plant naturalised in Ceylon,

the Australian Casuarina equisetum spreading in Taiwan,

and an excrescence on wing of several thrushes of Taiwan similar to a growth on wing of a Syrian species.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
5 Apr [1864]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 227a–c
Summary:

Sees difficulty of placing Scott at Kew. Suspects Balfour is prejudiced because Scott is a Darwinian.

CD’s former letter on Clematis [4403] blundered; work now being revised.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Philip Henry Gosse
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
5 Apr 1864
Source of text:
DAR 165: 79
Summary:

Asks how he can identify pollen-tubes.

Has succeeded in impregnating orchids of widely different genera with each other’s pollinia. "Is not this something new?"

Offers to exchange Catasetum for other varieties.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
[after 5 Apr 1864?]
Source of text:
DAR 157.2: 99
Summary:

Enquires about the relationship of English grains to French milligrammes.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Alfred Newton
Date:
6 Apr [1864]
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library (MS Add. 9839/1D/55)
Summary:

CD has thrown away injured partridge’s foot.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[after 6 Apr 1864?]
Source of text:
DAR 157.2: 100
Summary:

Calculates the relationship between grains and milligrams; asks his mother for a fruit tart and twelve napkins.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
7 Apr [1864]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 228
Summary:

CD apologises for having asked JDH to help him with Scott and now seeks advice on how to break the news.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Newton
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Apr 1864
Source of text:
DAR 172: 42
Summary:

CD need not worry about having discarded the partridge’s foot.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 Apr 1864
Source of text:
DAR 101: 206–7
Summary:

Men of Scott’s Celtic temperament are very troublesome. Tries to dissuade CD from hiring him as a scientific gardener.

George Rolleston, not Spencer, wrote review of Schleiden [Nat. Hist. Rev. (1864): 187–99].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Document type
Transcription available