Search: Martyn, Thomas in correspondent 
1810-1819::1813::06 in date 
letter in document-type 
No in transcription-available 
Sorted by:

Showing 14 of 4 items

From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
20 Jun 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/10, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Informed by vice-chancellor [William Chafy (1779-1843) vice-chancellor 1813 & 1829] that the trustees of the Botanic Garden have declined election of a Reader in Botany, however they would like another curator. Asks to be informed when Smith intends to canvas the university so as to be able to write to the heads of the colleges who would support Smith.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
11 Jun 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/8, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Confirms that Smith is correct in thinking that the [Walkerian] Lecturer need not be a member of the University, and can be a foreign or a stranger, but warns of "powerful opposition". Has written to the five trustees of the Botanic Garden in support of Smith and offers to write to the masters of Pembroke and Clare Hall Colleges when Smith decides to canvas. Shall be directed by Sir Joseph Banks in his private negotiations with Smith.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
16 Jun 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/9, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Relates Smith's progress, has support of vice-chancellor [William Chafy (1779-1843) vice-chancellor 1813 & 1829] but some trustees [of the Botanic Garden] may be hostile. Details of his salary, £200 per annum.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir Thomas Gery Cullum
Date:
2 Jun 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/13/22, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Discusses Smith's candidature for Cambridge botany professorship: Sir Joseph [Banks'] illness was a great loss; thinks it curious that the dissenting Smith should be supported by two Bishops [presumably Bishops of Carlisle, Samuel Goodenough, and Ely, Bowyer Sparke (1759-1836); the Bishop of Winchester, Brownlow North, also pledged his support for Smith in August 1813], but concedes "Botany is of no sect"; hopes Smith will be his successor but supposes he would have to conform to the Establishment. Responded immediately to Smith's report of the canvassing but too much of a philsopher to care what happens at Cambridge. Recovered after a confinement of three months caused by typhus.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London