Search: 1860-1869::1866 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 141160 of 1010 items

From:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
5 Mar 1866
Source of text:
ML 2: 158
Summary:

Surprised at Hooker’s introducing "so organic a change as a deviation in the axis of the planet" to explain the cold of the Glacial Period.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Johann Friedrich Theodor (Fritz) Müller
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Mar 1866
Source of text:
Möller ed. 1915–21, 2: 80–2
Summary:

Thanks CD for German translation of Origin.

Droughts over the summers have brought about changes in the numbers of plants and animals in the area. The small quantity of Orchestia darwinii that has survived the changes no longer includes two previously common male forms. Great changes also take place without such unusual physical conditions. The disappearance of a briefly abundant bryozoan in local caves has made way not for the return of original bryozoan inhabitants but for a completely new fauna.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
Date:
8 Mar [1866]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.316)
Summary:

Gives details of enclosed MS on cool period. Mentions Hooker’s opposed "axis of the earth" view. Causes of glacial period are beyond CD; "cannot believe change in land and water being more than a subsidiary agent".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Henslow
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 Mar 1866
Source of text:
DAR 166: 153
Summary:

Reviewing C. V. Naudin’s article ["Nouvelles recherches sur l’hybridité dans les végétaux", Ann. Sci. Nat. (Bot.) 4th ser. 19 (1863): 180–203] for Popular Science Review [5 (1866): 304–13]. Requests references.

Proposes to visit Down on Easter weekend.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
10 Mar 1866
Source of text:
K. M. Lyell ed. 1881, 2: 408–9
Summary:

Comments on cool-period MS. Still believes geographical changes principal cause of former changes of climate.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Henslow
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
12 Mar 1866
Source of text:
DAR 166: 154
Summary:

Thanks for references for his Naudin–hybridism paper [see 5029].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Benjamin Dann Walsh
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
13 Mar 1866
Source of text:
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago
Summary:

On the "bullae" as constant, regular generic characters in Hymenoptera. Disagrees with Louis Jurine ["Observations sur les ailes des hyménoptères", Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino 24 (1820): 177–214].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Georg Rudolf Emil (Rudolf) Suchsland
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 Mar 1866
Source of text:
DAR 177: 271
Summary:

Asks, on behalf of his father, whether he might publish a new German translation of the Origin, believing Bronn’s to be inadequate.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Henslow
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Mar [1866]
Source of text:
DAR 166: 155
Summary:

Forgot to thank CD for his praise of tendril paper [see 4944].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Henslow
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[18–30 Mar 1866]
Source of text:
DAR 166: 156
Summary:

Cannot come to Down on weekend because of teaching duties.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 Mar 1866
Source of text:
DAR 177: 71
Summary:

Describes plans for new German edition of Origin [1867].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Robert McLachlan
Date:
23 Mar [1866]
Source of text:
Raab Collection (dealer) (June 2014)
Summary:

Thanks for the paper on Sterrha (McLachlan 1865).

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Albert Müller
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 Mar 1866
Source of text:
DAR 171: 280
Summary:

Oswald Heer [in Die Urwelt der Schweiz (1866)] agrees with CD that Swiss ants (Formica sanguinea) capture more slaves than do British ants. Does this contradict selection, since the British ants are exposed to harder conditions and a poorer fauna?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Albert Müller
Date:
28 Mar [1866]
Source of text:
Universitätsbibliothek Basel, Handschriften (Allgemeine Autographensammlung, D)
Summary:

Writes on slave-making ants; cannot explain why fewer slaves are caught in England than in Switzerland.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Robert Swinhoe
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 Mar 1866
Source of text:
DAR 177: 329
Summary:

Sends CD comb of the Chinese honey-bee, as requested.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Richard Kippist
Date:
31 Mar [1866]
Source of text:
Linnean Society of London, Misc. loose letters, case 1: C. Darwin (4)
Summary:

Asks [Secretary] to list the proper titles of foreign societies of which he is an honorary member; he has mislaid diplomas.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Albert Müller
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
31 Mar 1866
Source of text:
DAR 171: 281
Summary:

Calls for more study of behaviour and less of classification to determine whether descent theory can bear the weight not [only] of reasoning but of fact. Hopes CD’s intended book [Variation] will help.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Henslow
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[after 19 Apr 1866]
Source of text:
DAR 166: 160
Summary:

Thanks for explanation on relative fertility of homostyled and heterostyled crosses in Primula. Sends an intermediate form with small stamens, but stigma only slightly above stamens.

Election as Botanical Lecturer at St Bartholomew’s Hospital.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Georg Rudolf Emil (Rudolf) Suchsland
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
2 Apr 1866
Source of text:
DAR 177: 272
Summary:

In response to a letter from RS’s father [translation enclosed] Schweizerbart has suggested H. B. Geinitz revise Bronn’s edition of the Origin, but RS doubts he is suitable.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
4 Apr [1866]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 282, 282b
Summary:

Extensive discussion of Pangenesis in reply to JDH’s comments.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail