Search: 1860-1869::1868::02 in date 
letter in document-type 
No in transcription-available 
Sorted by:

Showing 101120 of 155 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
23 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
DAR 94: 52–4
Summary:

Review in Athenæum full of contempt. Is sure Owen wrote it [see 5931].

Gardeners’ Chronicle review [(1868): 184] favourable.

Fears Pangenesis is still-born. Cites Bates, Spencer, Lubbock, and Sir Henry Holland. Is sure Pangenesis will sometime reappear. Questions that are connected and answered by Pangenesis.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Heinrich Ludwig Hermann (Hermann) Müller
Date:
23 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
DAR 146: 430
Summary:

Offers to undertake publication of English translation of Fritz Müller’s Für Darwin. W. S. Dallas will translate it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Heinrich Ludwig Hermann (Hermann) Müller
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[after 23 Feb 1868]
Source of text:
DAR 171: 292
Summary:

HM is certain his brother Fritz would like to see Für Darwin translated into English by Dallas. He will make arrangements with the German publisher.

Two friends are writing Darwinian works: Adolf Speyer on phylogeny of Lepidoptera

and August Röse on genealogy of mosses.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Asa Gray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 165: 161
Summary:

AG is writing notice of American edition of Variation [Nation 6 (1868): 234–6].

Pangenesis is "as good an hypothesis as one can now make".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Alfred Russel Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 106: B70–2, DAR 86: A10–11
Summary:

Responds to CD’s queries on polygamy in birds and orang.

Discusses sexual selection and secondary characters; colours and sexual preference.

Expresses his admiration for Pangenesis; it is superior to Herbert Spencer’s theory.

ARW differs somewhat with CD’s chapter on causes of variability [ch. 22 in Variation]. Thinks several of CD’s arguments are unsound.

Briefly discusses how natural selection might aid in producing sterility between allied species.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Murray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
DAR 171: 356
Summary:

Second issue [of Variation] is ready.

Murray thinks that the Athenæum review was written by J. E. Gray [see 5931].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Robert McLachlan
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 82: A86–7
Summary:

Reports that when August Meyer confined several distinct species of Phryganeidae they coupled and produced fertile ova, indicating that some specific characters are not so important so far as reproduction is concerned [see Descent 1: 342 n. 2].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
William Sweetland Dallas
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 162: 16
Summary:

Has difficulty translating Piderit’s use of verbissen.

Will hold F. Müller’s book until CD decides about translating it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Asa Gray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
25 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
DAR 165: 162
Summary:

AG is not surprised at popularity of CD’s Variation. Gives some corrections for next edition.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Darwin Fox
Date:
25 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
Christ’s College Library, Cambridge (MS 53 Fox 148a)
Summary:

Is working on "Sexual selection"; asks WDF to send observations on birds’ finding new mates during breeding season [see Descent 2: 103–7].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Karl Ludwig (Ludwig) Rütimeyer
Date:
25 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
Universitätsbibliothek Basel, Handschriften (G IV 91, 5)
Summary:

Will forward LR’s memoir to Earl of Tankerville. Has sent LR’s pamphlet on "Darwin Lehre" [Die Grenzen der Thierwelt (1868)] to a German lady he employs as a translator. Cannot agree that there is an innate principle of perfection.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
25 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff. 182–183)
Summary:

Thanks JM for presentation copies [of Variation]. Sends directions and list.

Has been told positively that hostile review in Athenæum was by Berthold Seemann, to whom he once refused a testimonial.

On the whole, reviews have been very good.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Johann Xaver Robert (Robert) Caspary
Date:
25 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
DAR 143: 252
Summary:

Will send English edition [of Variation] when available.

Mentions revisions in second issue concerning graft-hybrids.

Asks for Euryale seed for experiment.

Discusses fertility of crossed and self-fertilised plants.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Alexander Wallace
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
25 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 85: B69–70
Summary:

Asks CD to make his queries about proportion of sexes more precise so he can keep them in mind in his experiments with silkworms. [see Descent 1: 313.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Thomas Stretch
To:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
Date:
25 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 86: C13
Summary:

Eight-year record of sexes of chickens.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Lee
Date:
25 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
Walter R. Benjamin Autographs (dealer) (May 1988)
Summary:

Thanks for results on sexes of trout. [See 5793.] CD is collecting information about the proportional numbers of sexes in animals.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Robert McLachlan
Date:
25 Feb [1868]
Source of text:
Smithsonian Libraries and Archives (Dibner Library of the History of Science and Technology)
Summary:

Is obliged for the facts about the hybrids [see 5910], which permit him to reject the view of B. D. Walsh (and H. W. Bates?) that organs play an important part in keeping incipient species distinct.

He has asked John Murray to send RM a copy of Variation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26[–7] Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 102: 200–3, DAR 94: 67
Summary:

Could not believe Owen to be so demoniacal as to write the Athenæum review [of Variation].

Gardeners’ Chronicle review [see 5918] is weak. CD’s ideas on causes of variation may be as hazy as the reviewer’s.

Huxley’s clever remark on Pangenesis. JDH’s view of Pangenesis as fundamental to development doctrines, but nothing is gained by formulation in terms of germs or gemmules.

Tries to answer question on last page of CD’s letter anent sexuality.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Henry Walter Bates
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 82: A34–5
Summary:

Finds no absolute differences in size of sexes of Copridae. Gives several other genera in which males are larger than females.

Confirms his view of stridulation organ of house cricket. [see Descent 1: 354–5.]

Tells CD of a powerful convert to Darwinism: H. von Kiesenwetter of Berlin.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Robert Buist
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26 Feb 1868
Source of text:
DAR 82: B76–7
Summary:

On the pugnacity of male salmon during the spawning season.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail