Search: letter in document-type 
Huxley, T. H. in correspondent 
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives, Imperial College in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 6180 of 179 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
[after 20 Apr 1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 255)
Summary:

Asks whether THH had by mistake taken the National Review containing W. B. Carpenter’s review.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
7 May [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 117)
Summary:

Observations on changes in physical proportions of pigeons.

The Saturday Review of 5 May has a defence of CD and THH by "a jolly good fellow".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
3 July [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 121)
Summary:

Has had a report on Oxford BAAS meeting from Hooker. Asks THH to write about it. Has heard he fought nobly with Owen and Bishop Samuel Wilberforce. Regrets trouble he has caused his friends.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
[5 July 1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 123)
Summary:

THH’s long account of Oxford meeting. Has he no reverence for a bishop?

W. Hopkins’ review in Fraser’s Magazine is nothing new.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
20 July [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 125)
Summary:

On the Fraser’s Magazine review by Hopkins [see 2860] and the Quarterly Review article by Wilberforce ["Darwin’s Origin of species", 108 (1860): 225–64]. The course of opinion since Oxford BAAS meeting. Asa Gray.

Need for Natural History Review, but fears it will be a burden for THH and lessen his original work. His own problem with work: if he had other duties he would be able to do absolutely nothing in science.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
8 Aug [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 133)
Summary:

News of K. E. von Baer’s support is magnificent – far outweighs Owen and Agassiz. Asks THH to tell Baer that a statement from him would be of utmost value.

R. Wagner [in an article on Louis Agassiz’s principles of classification, Göttingsche gelehrte Anzeiger (1860) pt 2: 761–800] "goes half way" between Agassiz and Origin.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
10 Sept [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 135–6)
Summary:

Sends Asa Gray’s review [of Origin]. Asks THH’s advice on getting it reprinted in England.

Hooker’s expedition to Syria.

Disgraceful review of Tyndall’s book in Athenæum.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
18 Sept [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine Archives (Huxley papers)
Summary:

Expresses his grief upon hearing of the death of THH’s young son. Recalls his own bitter loss of a child.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
1 Nov [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 141)
Summary:

THH’s term "Pithecoid Man" is a theory in itself.

CD is convinced that his doctrine of a mundane period of glaciation is correct.

Henrietta’s serious illness.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
10 Nov [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 143)
Summary:

On the prospectus of Natural History Review. Suggests it might offer information on whether subjects that correspondents may wish to investigate have been done already.

Henrietta still very seriously ill.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
16 Nov [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 145)
Summary:

Thanks THH for his lecture ["On the study of zoology", Lay sermons, addresses and reviews (1870), pp. 104–31]. Best exposé and classification of the higher objects of natural history he has ever read. On reading and observation.

Henrietta’s lack of improvement.

R. McDonnell’s work on rays and electric organs of fishes.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
22 Nov [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 147)
Summary:

Has had a good letter from Robert McDonnell. Thinks he will be converted in time.

Impatient to see first number of Natural History Review.

Murray wants a new edition of Origin immediately.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
2 Dec [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 149)
Summary:

Is sick of hostile reviews but they have helped in showing where he must expatiate and expand in new edition of Origin.

Has more confidence in the general truth of his view. Disappointed THH does not think it more probable than he did at first.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
5 [Dec 1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5:130)
Summary:

Thanks THH for his note; pleased by what he says. Is too sensitive about shades of opinion of men like THH.

The Macmillan article on Origin [H. Fawcett, "A popular exposition of Mr Darwin on the origin of species", Macmillan’s Mag. 3 (1860): 81–92].

J. E. Gray’s misunderstanding of Origin.

Account of the encounter at Oxford BAAS meeting.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
11 Dec [1860]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 166)
Summary:

Forwards A. Gray’s letter [inquiring whether THH would be interested in printing Chauncey Wright’s review of Origin].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
3 Jan [1861]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 155, 372–6)
Summary:

Congratulates THH on first number of Natural History Review.

THH’s article on brain ["On the zoological relations of man with the lower animals", Nat. Hist. Rev. (1861): 67–84] completely smashes Owen.

Owen’s Leeds address [Rep. BAAS (1858): xlix–cx].

In his historical sketch of opinion on species CD has picked out some sentences [by Owen] with which he will take some revenge. CD is not bold enough to come to an open quarrel.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
17 Feb [1861]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 169)
Summary:

Chauncey Wright’s review of Origin: A. Gray asks that THH append a list of philosophical books on subject if he accepts it for Natural History Review.

Sends Gray’s pamphlet of his (republished) reviews [Natural selection not inconsistent with natural theology (1861)] for notice.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
22 Feb [1861]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 157); DAR 145
Summary:

Invites Mrs Huxley and the children to spend a fortnight at Down.

MS of Chauncey Wright’s review has not yet arrived.

[P.S. missing from original.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
1 Apr [1861]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 162)
Summary:

Does not think much of the arguments of the Duke [of Argyll], though liberal and complimentary to himself.

THH’s Athenæum letter ["Man and the apes", 30 Mar 1861, p. 433] almost too civil. What a thorn THH must be to Owen.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:
22 May [1861]
Source of text:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 164)
Summary:

Chauncey Wright’s review of Origin.

Family plans for Torquay in summer.

J. S. Henslow’s death.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project