Search: letter in document-type 
Darwin, C. R. in author 
Murray, John (b) in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 6180 of 200 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
18 May [1860]
Source of text:
Dunedin Public Library (Reed collection)
Summary:

Thanks for six copies of Journal of researches [1860 ed.].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
7 June [1860]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 f. 79)
Summary:

Asks how Origin [2d ed.] is selling and whether a new edition is likely to be wanted "soon, ever, or never". Asks partly from curiosity, partly because of a break in his work, and the answer will decide what his next job will be.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
3 Aug [1860]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff.74–75)
Summary:

Thanks JM for Quarterly Review [July 1860] in which he is "quizzed splendidly". The Bishop [Wilberforce] misrepresents him often, but clever men think they can write a review with very slight knowledge of the book.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
12 Oct [1860]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff.82–83)
Summary:

Lyell tells CD Origin still sells "pretty well", which pleases and surprises him. If a new edition should be called for, he has a good many corrections and a historical preface for it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
20 Nov [1860]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff.77–78)
Summary:

Hears Origin [2d ed.] was sold out. Next edition will need a good many alterations. Asks JM to provide him with a copy of the second revised U. S. edition. He wants to see how his long corrections look in type.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
22 [Nov 1860]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff. 72–73)
Summary:

Asks how soon he must send proofs [of Origin, 3d ed.] to printer. His corrections would not take more than three weeks. The longest job will be to glance over the endless reviews to guide him in his corrections.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
3 Dec [1860]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff.80–81)
Summary:

Asks again how great a hurry there is for new edition [of Origin, 3d ed.]. Corrections will enlarge volume by a dozen or twenty pages, plus a short historical sketch. Would like "With Corrections" in title.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
5 Dec [1860]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff.60–61)
Summary:

Reminds JM that copies of diagram must be printed off [for Origin, 3d ed.]. It must be carefully reproduced or parts of the book will be as unintelligible as Hebrew. Hopes never again to have to make so many additions in order that many rather stupid reviewers will at least understand what he meant.

There is a good article on the Origin in Macmillan’s Magazine [by Henry Fawcett].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
21 Jan [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff.98–99)
Summary:

Thinks third edition of Origin should advertise "additions and corrections", for the additions are important. They will add 30 pages to the book; there will also be a short historical sketch. Asks for some copies for friends.

Also curious to know how Journal of researches has sold. The new issue seemed a rash venture to him.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
24 Feb [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 f. 100)
Summary:

If JM disapproves of inserting CD’s geological works on back of title-page [of Origin, 3d ed.], he should strike them out. CD cares little. Reminds him to insert "additions and corrections" in advertisements. Sends list for presentation copies.

Asks whether his Journal of researches has sold at all satisfactorily.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
3 Mar [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 f. 101)
Summary:

Making slow progress with Variation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
30 Apr [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42153 f. 27)
Summary:

Thanks JM for bill for £480 and sends receipt. Number of copies differs in note and in receipt (2500 and 2000, respectively). Not surprised sale is slackening; number printed was bold. Reminds JM to advertise "with additions and corrections".

Will consult JM on illustrations for Variation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
3 May [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 f. 103)
Summary:

Regrets the error in the bill and receipt. CD is surprised at so large a reduction in profit in the last edition.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
8 May [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42153 f. 26)
Summary:

Acknowledges receipt of promissory note for £372 from JM for third edition of Origin.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
10 Sept [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff. 104–105)
Summary:

Asks that a copy of Origin [3d ed.] be sent to Mlle Clémence-Auguste Royer; she has arranged with a publisher for a French translation.

Origin is exciting much attention in Germany.

Surprised to receive a Dutch translation.

Has never seen an advertisement [of 3d ed.], which is a pity. Hopes "Bishop of Oxford & Co." have not made JM sorry he published it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
21 Sept [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff. 106–107)
Summary:

Asks JM’s opinion on publishing his MS on orchids. It has new facts, and resembles a Bridgewater Treatise, but only those who care for natural history would be interested. Would share the risk.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
24 Sept [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff. 108–109B)
Summary:

Thanks JM for his liberal offer [to publish Orchids]. CD fears the public will not be interested, but thinks it will "do good to the Origin as it will show that I worked hard on details and it will perhaps serve [to] illustrate how Natural History may be worked under the belief of the modification of Species".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
3 Oct [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff. 110–111)
Summary:

Would JM object to size of Orchids being same as W. N. Hutchinson, Dog breeding [1850]? Prefers little book, not to look pretentious.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
5 Oct [1861]
Source of text:
Private collection
Summary:

Likes the idea of matching Orchids with Origin. Begs for large print and spacing so that the book will not look "ridiculously small".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Murray
Date:
21 Oct [1861]
Source of text:
National Library of Scotland (John Murray Archive) (Ms.42152 ff. 112–113)
Summary:

G. B. Sowerby, Jr has done the drawings for Orchids woodcuts. Calls JM’s attention to the fact that a first-rate cutter must be employed.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project