Search: letter in document-type 
1810-1819 in date 
Martyn, Thomas in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 118 of 18 items

From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
27 May 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/7, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Professorship at Cambridge University. Offers to write to the Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge [William Chafy (1779-1843) vice-chancellor 1813 & 1829] in support of Smith's candidature. Warns of impediments: the lecture room has been given up to Dr Clarke, Professor of Mineralogy, and a lack of interest in the subject meant [Richard] Relhan had difficulties making up a class when he lectured on botany. Although has no intention of retiring concedes the possibility of being incapacitated. Discusses other candidates and the university establishment, explains the three components of his position (University Professorship, Walkerian lectureship attached to Botanic Garden, and Regius Professorship) and suggests a course of action: if Smith secures majority support of the Botanic Garden governors then he would resign the lectureship in Smith's favour, strengthening Smith's position for the Regius Professorship at his death.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir Thomas Gery Cullum
Date:
2 Jun 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/13/22, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Discusses Smith's candidature for Cambridge botany professorship: Sir Joseph [Banks'] illness was a great loss; thinks it curious that the dissenting Smith should be supported by two Bishops [presumably Bishops of Carlisle, Samuel Goodenough, and Ely, Bowyer Sparke (1759-1836); the Bishop of Winchester, Brownlow North, also pledged his support for Smith in August 1813], but concedes "Botany is of no sect"; hopes Smith will be his successor but supposes he would have to conform to the Establishment. Responded immediately to Smith's report of the canvassing but too much of a philsopher to care what happens at Cambridge. Recovered after a confinement of three months caused by typhus.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
11 Jun 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/8, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Confirms that Smith is correct in thinking that the [Walkerian] Lecturer need not be a member of the University, and can be a foreign or a stranger, but warns of "powerful opposition". Has written to the five trustees of the Botanic Garden in support of Smith and offers to write to the masters of Pembroke and Clare Hall Colleges when Smith decides to canvas. Shall be directed by Sir Joseph Banks in his private negotiations with Smith.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
16 Jun 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/9, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Relates Smith's progress, has support of vice-chancellor [William Chafy (1779-1843) vice-chancellor 1813 & 1829] but some trustees [of the Botanic Garden] may be hostile. Details of his salary, £200 per annum.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
20 Jun 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/10, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Informed by vice-chancellor [William Chafy (1779-1843) vice-chancellor 1813 & 1829] that the trustees of the Botanic Garden have declined election of a Reader in Botany, however they would like another curator. Asks to be informed when Smith intends to canvas the university so as to be able to write to the heads of the colleges who would support Smith.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
26 Aug 1813
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/11, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Reiterates importance of having the vice-chancellor's [William Chafy (1779-1843), vice-chancellor 1813 & 1829] support for both the Walkerian lectureship and the whole Professorship. Explains structure of the Senate, lists college heads currently supporting Smith, debates other potential supporters and process of election. [Arthur] Biggs' [(1765-1848)] election as curator of Botanic Garden. Sir Issac Pennington [(1745-1817), physician and chemist] thinks Smith's non-membership of the university or Church of England makes it difficult for him to be granted an appointment; Martyn refutes this, with examples. Death of [George] Shaw.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Jun 1814
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/12, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. [Richard] Relhan has enquired after a report that [Martyn] is resigning in Smith's favour. Smith right in gaining support from outside Cambridge. Discusses process of Cambridge elections and reiterates Dr [Richard] Walker's [(1679-1764) founder of Cambridge Botanic Garden] provision in his gift of the lectureship that a foreigner may be elected if sufficiently qualified.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
21 Oct 1814
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/13, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Approves of Smith's plan to only apply for Walkerian lecturership at present and await opportunity of applying for professorship. Equates Smith's situation to hostility his father [John Martyn (1699-1768) Cambridge professor of botany 1732-1762] faced when applying for professorship.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
9 Dec 1814
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/14, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Had hoped Smith's letter would request his resignation as he is anxious about the governors of St John's and is too ill to go to Cambridge to vote.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Jan 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/15, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Had feared Smith had given up Cambridge. Promises his resignation when Smith requires it, details of his own election. Support of Bishop of Ely [Bowyer Sparke (1759-1836)], Dean of Norwich [Joseph Turner (1747-1828)], College Heads, and vice-chancellor all important but the Duke of Bedford cannot do much. Warns Smith of deceit and rebuffs within the university. Notifies Smith that the professorship has no control over the Botanic Garden or rights to plants for lectures. [Philip] Miller's monument.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
23 Jan 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/16, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Confirms that the election is open rather than his previous assumption that the heads of the colleges named two out of the candidates. Experience of his own election. Ready to resign in Smith's favour, advises Smith on how to proceed from this point, advising him to begin canvassing in London to use his popularity there. Received letters from [Richard] Relhan but not in relation to professorship.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/17, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Erroneous reports of his death in Norwich and London papers have initiated canvassing at Cambridge. [Richard] Relhan has urged Martyn to vacate Walkerian lectureship, details of Relhan's canvassing.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
23 Feb 1816
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/18, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Believes Smith will encounter powerful opposition from Trinity and St John's Colleges. Discusses support of other college heads.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
14 Mar 1818
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/19, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Due to illness unable to undertake next term's Walkerian lectures, asks Smith to deputise for him.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
3 Apr 1818
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/20, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Sorry that Smith met with opposition from Dr Clarke, professor of mineralogy, and Mr Cummings in trying to rearrange botany lecture room. Refutes Clarke's claims that he only ever gave one lecture on botany. Dr [Richard] Walker [(1679-1764) founder of Cambridge Botanic Garden] intended that the botanical garden should promote study of medicine with particular attention to poisonous plants and Martyn always read lecture on poisonous plants, inspired by Dr [William] Heberden's [(1710-1801) lecturer at Cambridge] Materia Medica lectures, however the medical quarter of garden has since been destroyed.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
12 Apr 1818
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/21, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Outraged by the Tutors opposition to Smith on grounds of his not being a member of the University, gives numerous examples of previous foreign and non-member professors. Glad that Smith is pleased with [George Cornelius] Gorham, details of his botanising. Suffering from vertigo in part due "to the weight of the atmosphere". Flooding from heavy rains.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 Apr 1818
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/22, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. Has found a manuscript copy of Dr [Richard] Walker's [(1679-1764) founder of Cambridge Botanic Garden] donation confirming that the Walkerian lectureship can be granted to a foreigner.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Thomas Martyn
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
5 Mar 1819
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/7/23, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Smith's candidature for Botany Professorship at Cambridge University. [James Henry] Monk's [(1784-1856) Regius Professor of Greek, Cambridge] attack on Smith in "Quarterly Review". Believes Smith will never carry the professorship or lectureship, due in part to changing circumstances in professorships at Sidney Sussex College. Observes he and Sir Joseph Banks were negligent in supporting James Donn [(1758-1813)] and [Arthur] Biggs [(1765-1848)] for curatorship of Botanic Garden without fully knowing their religious persuasions.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London