Search: letter in document-type 
1860-1869::1862::10::28 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 15 of 5 items

From:
William Erasmus Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
28 Oct 1862
Source of text:
DAR 162.1: 94
Summary:

Distances between Lythrum plants.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
Julius Haast
Date:
28 October 1862
Source of text:
MS papers 37, folder 204, no. 530, Haast family papers, Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
From:
Henry Wentworth Dyke Acland
To:
Sir John Herschel
Date:
[28 October 1862]
Source of text:
RS:HS 1.383
Summary:

Informing him of a projected change in the scale of weights to be used in the new British Pharmacopaeia. Would like JH's opinion on this.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
Text Online
From:
Michael Faraday
To:
Henri Victor Regnault
Date:
28 October 1862
Source of text:
RI MS
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Faraday Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Asa Gray
Date:
28 October 1862
Source of text:
JDH/2/22/1/1 f.17-18, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

JDH hopes to send Asa Gray copies of GENERA PLANTARUM with the autumn box of 'distributa'. JDH discusses Sir John William Dawson's criticisms of one of his essays concerning plant distribution [possibly JDH's introductory essay from FLORA ANTARCTICA], addressing each point in detail. Dawson's objections centre on the flora of Scandinavia & supposed geological inaccuracies, many concerning Greenland. In the past JDH & Sir Charles Bunbury have quashed some of Dawson's palaeobotany papers sent to the Geological Society. JDH is convinced his own conclusions are sound, they have the support of James Hector & Sir Charles Lyell. Dawson is against Darwinism & the theory of evolution by natural selection. JDH notes that there is currently a lot of changes in geological theory & hypotheses in the discipline are difficult to prove, there is an argument about the effectiveness of current species variation & distribution in determining past land formations. JDH believes geological & biological evidence must both be taken into account to form a strong hypothesis. He makes the point that all facts began as theory, just as absolute specific creation is now questioned so may creation by variation be disproved, or it could become established fact. JDH mentions his own work on Welwitschia [mirabilis], specifically characteristics of ovules in male & female flowers, & Gray's work on Cypripedium. Thanks Gray for Asimina & urges him to write a systematic resume of American flora.

Contributor:
Hooker Project