Search: letter in document-type 
1860-1869::1864::09 in date 
Darwin, C. R. in author 
Sorted by:

Showing 111 of 11 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
[1 Sept 1864]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 248
Summary:

CD continues to have trouble reconciling the Veitch’s names for Bignonia plants and Kew names.

Lyell and Falconer called on CD in London.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Antoine Auguste (Auguste) Laugel
Date:
4 Sept [1864]
Source of text:
Librairie du Manoir de Pron (dealers) (January 2016)
Summary:

Thanks for a copy of AAL’s Problèmes de la nature 1864 (Problems of Nature; Laugel 1864).

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hermann Adolph Christian August (Hermann) Kindt
Date:
7 Sept [1864]
Source of text:
Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig (Autographensammlung Kestner: Slg. Kestner/II/C/II/125/Nr. 1, Mappe 125, Blatt Nr1)
Summary:

Explains that Orchids has been translated into German (Bronn trans. 1862); and that Living Cirripedia can now be purchased at Hardwicke’s, 192 Piccadilly, London.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Asa Gray
Date:
13 Sept [1864]
Source of text:
Gray Herbarium of Harvard University (89)
Summary:

Has finished Climbing plants;

resuming work on Variation.

Sends abstract of John Scott’s paper [see 4332].

Has received review of Herbert Spencer but cannot believe AG wrote it unless he has muddled his brains with metaphysics.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
13 Sept [1864]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 249a–b
Summary:

Pleased that Bentham is cautious about Naudin’s view of reversion. CD can show experimentally that crossing of races and species tends to bring back ancient characters.

Suggests Gärtner’s Bastarderzeugung [1849] be translated

and that Oliver review Scott’s Primula paper [J. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Bot.) 8 (1865): 78–126] for a future issue of Natural History Review.

Is working on Variation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Hutton Balfour
Date:
15 Sept [1864]
Source of text:
Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh (Balfour papers)
Summary:

Inquires which nurserymen near Edinburgh cultivate coloured primroses and cowslips. Wants to repeat John Scott’s remarkable experiments.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hermann Adolph Christian August (Hermann) Kindt
Date:
17 Sept 1864
Source of text:
J. A. Stargardt (dealers) (11 and 12 June 2002); Manchester Libraries, Information and Archives (Autograph Letters: Harland Collection, vol. 1, p. 67, GB127.MS f 091 H15)
Summary:

Sends his thanks for a kind letter; he has copied out the last sentence of the Origin.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Daniel Oliver
Date:
17 Sept [1864]
Source of text:
DAR 185: 119
Summary:

Glad that Oliver is to review John Scott’s paper in the Natural History Review (Scott 1864a). Apologises that his enclosed references (now missing) are so paltry.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Maxwell Tylden Masters
Date:
20 Sept [1864]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.)
Summary:

CD sends thanks for MTM’s note on monsters. Adds comment on MTM’s point that some species become monstrous more frequently than others.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
23 September 1864
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library: DAR 115: 250, 250b, 250c
Summary:

Darwin suggests that a Royal Medal might be bestowed on ARW before too long.

Contributor:
Alfred Russel Wallace Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
23 Sept [1864]
Source of text:
DAR 96: 14; DAR 115: 250a–c
Summary:

Pleased with news of BAAS meeting

and Scott’s possible position as Thomas Anderson’s curator.

Suggests Wallace is due for a Royal Medal.

Agrees with JDH’s criticism of Lyell’s address [see 4614].

Bentham’s Linnean Society address treats continuity of life in a vague non-natural sense.

Rereading his old MS [Natural selection] CD is impressed with work he had already done.

Writing Variation much harder than Climbing plants.

Encloses request to JDH to propose, or suggest on his behalf, that the Ray Society publish a translation of C. F. von Gärtner’s Versuche und Beobachtungen über die Bastarderzeugung im Pflanzenreich (1849).

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail