Search: letter in document-type 
1880-1889 in date 
Romanes, G. J. in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 2140 of 57 items

From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Mar 1881
Source of text:
DAR 176: 216
Summary:

Responds to MS of Earthworms. An objective but arbitrary test of intelligence in animals is the ability to learn from experience. Earthworms fall on the border of intelligence. They could justly be called intelligent if they could learn by experience to manipulate some unknown, exotic leaf. CD should make clear that intelligence does not imply self-consciousness.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
9 Mar [1881]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.585)
Summary:

Comments on GJR’s view of animal consciousness. Mentions experiment on learning among worms.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
24 Mar 1881
Source of text:
E. D. Romanes 1896 , pp. 107–8
Summary:

Suggests transplanting plant ovaries to test Pangenesis.

None of the cats released in experiment found its way back.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
26 Mar 1881
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.586)
Summary:

Discusses difficulties involved in plant experiment designed to test Pangenesis.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
16 Apr 1881
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.587)
Summary:

Discusses concept of intelligence in his Earthworms manuscript.

Remarks on GJR’s work on echinoderms.

Comments on Wilhelm Roux [Der Kampf der Theile im Organismus (1881)].

Discusses animal instincts, citing Fabre’s description of sand-wasps.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Apr 1881
Source of text:
E. D. Romanes 1896, p. 112
Summary:

Looks forward to reading CD’s Earthworms.

Agrees that habits of sand-wasp are determined by natural selection.

Experiment of exposing plants to flashing light gives uncertain result.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
18 Apr 1881
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.588)
Summary:

Discusses GJR’s experiments on heliotropism in plants; views of Philippe van Tieghem and Julius von Wiesner. Describes his own experiments.

Mentions his letter on vivisection [to Frithiof Holmgren, see 13115] in the Times [18 Apr 1881].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
22 Apr [1881]
Source of text:
E. D. Romanes 1896, p. 116
Summary:

Only more sensitive seedlings respond to flashing light.

CD’s letter to Times ["On vivisection", 22 Apr 1881] in every way admirable.

GJR to be Zoological Secretary of Linnean Society.

Has decided on arrangement of material for his books Animal intelligence [1882]

and Mental evolution in animals [1883].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
25 Apr 1881
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.589)
Summary:

Comments on GJR’s letter in the Times [25 Apr 1881] concerning vivisection. Mentions activity of anti-vivisectionists, G. R. Jesse and F. P. Cobbe.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
25 May [1881]
Source of text:
E. D. Romanes 1896, p. 118
Summary:

Suggests CD delay arrangements for his Linnean Society portrait. GJR thinks John Collier would be willing to paint it.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
27 May 1881
Source of text:
Linnean Society of London (LL/4)
Summary:

Agrees to sit for portrait. Thinks John Collier is a good artist, an opinion based on his portrait of Hooker.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
24 June [1881]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.530)
Summary:

Discusses possible case of inherited memory involving Pompilus. Cites similar example of electric eel.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
27 June [1881]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.)
Summary:

CD is glad the portrait [of CD by John Collier] has been arranged; suggests dates, but feels he should have no say in the subscriptions or remuneration.

Thinks the Lakes are beautiful.

Is reading W. Graham’s The creed of science.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
1 July [1881]
Source of text:
E. D. Romanes 1896 , p. 119
Summary:

Has told John Collier to write to CD to arrange for portrait.

Will read [W. Graham’s] Creed of science.

Has got into row with W. B. Carpenter over thought-reading.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
4 July [1881]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.594)
Summary:

Is returning to Down.

Rejoices that GJR writes so much in Nature.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
7 Aug [1881]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.596)
Summary:

Encloses notice about Wilhelm Roux’s book [see 13118].

Comments on John Collier’s portrait.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 Aug 1881
Source of text:
E. D. Romanes 1896, pp. 120–1
Summary:

Delighted that portrait of CD has "pleased those who are the best judges".

Arranging for vote on vivisection by International Medical Congress.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
31 Aug 1881
Source of text:
E. D. Romanes 1896, pp. 121–3
Summary:

Asks CD to contribute to symposium on vivisection to be published in Nineteenth Century [10: 920–48].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George John Romanes
Date:
2 Sept 1881
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.597)
Summary:

Unable to contribute an essay to a symposium on the subject of vivisection. Objects to use of term "symposium".

Mentions articles of Hermann Müller.

Death of his brother Erasmus [26 Aug 1881].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George John Romanes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
4 Sept [1881]
Source of text:
E. D. Romanes 1896, p. 125
Summary:

Not intended to call vivisection article a symposium [Nineteenth Century 10 (1881): 920–48].

Sympathy on death of Erasmus Darwin.

Trying some experiments with bees to test their direction-finding methods.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project