Search: letter in document-type 
1890-1899::1893 in date 
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 120 of 66 items

Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
William Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
3 January 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1891-6, f. 43.Date stamped: Royal Gardens Kew 8. Feb. 93, and annotated in pencil by W. Watson: 51/1893 (i.e, register number in Kew Inwards Book of specimens received); and in blue pencil by W. Thiselton-Dye:r Bulletin. This letter, lightly edited, is quoted extensively in the Bulletin of miscellaneous information, 1893, p. 112 (B93.05.04). A. R . Wallace had noted in The Garden that probably no attempt has been made to obtain plants from the cold uplands of Australia. ‘Acting on this hint, a copy of Mr. Wallace’s paper was forwarded to Sir F. von Mueller in Melbourne, to whom we are indebted for a very large proportion of the living representatives of the Australian flora now at Kew, and whose zeal is shown by the following letter which accompanied a box containing two plants both likely to live’. (Forwarding letter not found.)
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Dr Paul Friedrich August Ascherson
Date:
30 January 1893
Source of text:
JDH/2/3/1 f.121-123, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Hooker Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Sir William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
28 February 1893
Source of text:
JDH/2/16 f.128, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

JDH explains why he considers Dr [James William Helenus] Trail a suitable candidate for fellowship of the Royal Society. It was JDH who recommended that Trail go on the expedition up the Amazon 12 years previously & Trail made the most of the opportunity for scientific purposes making excellent collections & observations, especially papers on the palms of the Amazon published in [Henry] Trimen's journal of botany in 1876 & work on Amazon ant-housing plants. He has also published further papers, catalogued in the Royal Society Compilations & is producing more. Trail is also a productive teacher of biological science & his students have often proved excellent members of expeditions. JDH intends to add his signature to Trail's paper of qualifications.

Contributor:
Hooker Project
Text Online
From:
Frederick Bailey
To:
Ferdinand von Mueller
Date:
March 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Letters to Joseph Hooker, vol. 16, f. 7
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
William Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
7 March 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1891-6, f. 44
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Sir Francis “Frank” Darwin
Date:
13 March 1893
Source of text:
JDH/2/3/3 f.208-209, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Hooker Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
William Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
21 March 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Kew Gardens, Colonial floras, Kewensia, K9/655.59, f. 94
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
Joseph Hooker
Date:
28 March 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Letters to Joseph Hooker, vol. 16, ff. 3-6
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
William Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
2 April 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew. Kew Gardens, Colonial Floras. Kewensia, K9/655.59. ff. 96–97
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
Charles Prentice
Date:
4 April 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Kew Gardens, Colonial Floras, Kewensia, K9/655.59, f. 98
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
Thomas Wilson
Date:
8 April 1893
Source of text:
V93/2957, unit 728, VPRS 3992/P inward registered correspondence, VA 475 Chief Secretary's Department, Public Record Office, Victoria
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
William Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
9 April 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew. Kew Gardens, Colonial Floras. Kewensia, K9/655.59. f. 95
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Sir William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
9 April 1893
Source of text:
JDH/2/16 f.129, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

JDH writes to Sir William Turner Thiselton-Dyer [WTTD] giving his opinion of various publications by Alphonse de Candolle. JDH does not intend to write a notice of 'Alphonse de Candolle's [recent] work', as he has a very low opinion of it. JDH criticise de Candolle's descriptions & his systematic work. JDH lists those he considers superior contemporary systematists; Pourret, Saint-Hilaire, von Martius, Bentham, Endlicher, Gray & Engelmann. JDH has a higher opinion of de Candolle's geographical botany. He reviewed his GÉOGRAPHIE BOTANIQUE in the JOURNAL OF BOTANY, concluding that it was full of useful data but lacked philosophical views & was tainted by a belief in multiple creation of species & scepticism towards evolution, though this was before the 'Darwinian Epoch'. Darwin in fact had a high opinion of the work, & [Asa] Gray a modest one. JDH considers THE ORIGINE DES PLANTES CULTIVÉES an excellent book but not comprehensive, e.g. it does not address the cultivation of Amorphophallus campanulatus or Tacca, which is cultivated from Tahiti to Malaya. JDH calls THE HISTOIRE DES SCIENCES ET DES SAVANTS 'very good & instructive' & thinks its highlight's de Candolle's forte, which is as a statistician. He has not read de Candolle's biography of his father [Augustin Pyrame de Candolle] or his methodology of descriptive botany & was unimpressed by his INTRODUCTION TO BOTANY. He summarises that it is impossible to consider the work of de Candolle without appearing to deprecate him though his wealth & leisure have allowed him time to contribute much to botany. JDH suggests that [William Botting] Hemsley take on LOIS DE LA NOMENCLATURE BOTANIQUE. JDH mentions some Tibetan plants of interest & 'securing' George Massee. JDH is working on Indian Eriocaulons, which he thinks is the most minute flowers genus of Phenogams, & grasses. JDH thanks WTTD for some Rhododendrons. Balfour has sent JDH a list of New Zealand Veronicas which they have at Edinburgh [Botanic Garden].

Contributor:
Hooker Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Sir William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
17 April 1893
Source of text:
JDH/2/16 f.130, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

JDH critiques the work of Alphonse de Candolle. His MONOGRAPHIAE PHANEROGAMARUM does not accord with JDH's revision of the Phanerogams. JDH recognises that he has worked hard at botany, though he is wealthy enough not to have needed to. However, he finds that de Candolle's treatment of plant distribution GÉOGRAPHIE BOTANIQUE RAISONNÉE shows a lack of deep understanding of the subject & is more a collection of useful data than an attempt to reach any conclusions. JDH asks if Alphonse de Candolle is dead. JDH has had no answer to his letter to Carriere[?]. [George] Bentham has completed work on the Australian Enocaulaceae & JDH is reviewing them to determine which ones are Indian species. JDH suggests that de Candolle's systematic work does not compare favourable with those of Asa Gray, Antoine Jusseau & George Bentham but if de Candolle is dead them JDH will take on de Candolle's systematic work.

Contributor:
Hooker Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
William Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
18 April 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Kew correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1891-6, f. 45
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Reverend James Digues de La Touche
Date:
2 May 1893
Source of text:
JDH/2/12 f.91-91a, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Hooker Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
William Thiselton-Dyer
Date:
15 May 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Kew Correspondence, Australia, Mueller, 1891-1896, f. 46
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
Text Online
From:
William Thiselton-Dyer
To:
Ferdinand von Mueller
Date:
20 May 1893
Source of text:
RBG Kew, Kew Gardens, Colonial Floras, Kewensia, K9/655.59, ff. 105-6
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
John Firminger Duthie
Date:
24 May 1893
Source of text:
JDH/2/3/4 f.44, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Hooker Project
From:
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Reverend James Digues de La Touche
Date:
24 May 1893
Source of text:
JDH/2/12 f.93, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Hooker Project