Search: letter in document-type 
1860-1869::1869 in date 
Cambridge University Library in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 4160 of 379 items

From:
D. Appleton & Co
To:
Asa Gray
Date:
1 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 159: 83
Summary:

Statement of sales of U. S. edition of Origin.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Stephen Augustine Merrell
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
1 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 171: 157, 157/1
Summary:

Corrects T. M. Brewer’s statement, cited in the Origin, that the American cuckoo never uses other birds’ nests. [See Origin, 5th ed., p. 266.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Julius Victor Carus
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
2 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 86: A45; DAR 161: 69
Summary:

Sends translation of Mr Steiger’s letter responding to question CD had asked about growth of horns of merino rams.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Andrew Crombie Ramsay
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
2 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 176: 14
Summary:

Lyell says CD is revising what he says about the Weald in the Origin. Asks CD to look at his subaerial denudation views in his book [Physical geology and geography of Great Britain, 2d ed. (1864)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Murray
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Feb [1869]
Source of text:
DAR 171: 363
Summary:

Gives consent, which is unnecessary because term of protection has expired, for French translation of Journal of researches.

Is at a loss to know how many copies of F. Müller’s Facts and arguments for Darwin to print.

The printer is ready for copy for a new "edition" of Variation. [Presumably another issue. 2d edition did not appear until 1875.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Andrew Crombie Ramsay
Date:
3 Feb [1869]
Source of text:
DAR 261.9: 4 (EH 88205977)
Summary:

Received and read ACR’s Physical geology. Places him at head of the subaeria denudationists. Unfortunately CD confounded William Whitaker’s article with ACR’s views and gave Whitaker credit for first producing the evidence. Will rectify it now. Has eliminated the rubbish he wrote on the Weald and will add a paragraph on importance of subaerial denudation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
James Croll
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
4 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 161: 263
Summary:

Argues for great age of earth before the Cambrian period. Opposes measuring age from secular cooling. Opposes Sir William Thomson. Lyell’s error on secular cooling.

Thanks for Moseley citation ["On the mechanical possibility of the descent of glaciers", Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 17 (1869): 202–8].

In Edinburgh he feels out of touch with latest developments.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Frederik Anthony von Hartsen
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
5 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 166: 114
Summary:

Believes that species or genus may have originated more than once from separate ancestors, i.e., polyphyletically.

Discusses relation of CD’s theory to religion. Has written popular account of CD’s theory in Dutch [Darwin en de Godsdienst (1869)].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Carl Friedrich Claus
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 161: 177
Summary:

Pleased by CD’s good opinion and offer to provide material. Discusses work he would do on cirripedes.

Moritz Wagner’s views on migration of species;

his doubts about Fritz Müller’s views on developmental stages of Crustacea.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Howard Darwin
Date:
6 Feb [1869]
Source of text:
DAR 210.1: 4
Summary:

John Lubbock regrets GHD did not take the Eton post. JL thinks scientific masters will soon occupy places as high and as profitable as classical masters.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
6 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 6
Summary:

Has inquired about magnetic storms. Any effect that could be produced by the sun’s energy in retarding the cooling of the earth would be utterly insignificant.

Tells of his visit to Eton.

Is uncertain about next steps to take for a legal career.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Text Online
From:
Darwin, Emma
To:
Allen, Fanny
Date:
8 February [1869]
Source of text:
DAR 219.11: 9
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Darwin Family Letters
From:
John Lubbock, 4th baronet and 1st Baron Avebury
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
8 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 170: 71
Summary:

Down School funds.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Georg Recht
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
9 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 176: 74
Summary:

Sends MS. Asks CD to recommend it to a scientific society.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Ferdinand Maria Malven
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
12 Feb [1869]
Source of text:
DAR 171: 35
Summary:

Librarian to the Board of Trade proposes a celebration of CD’s 60th birthday by the Vienna Free Press.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Edward Wilson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
12 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 181: 126
Summary:

Returns a book on beavers borrowed from CD.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Lubbock, 4th baronet and 1st Baron Avebury
Date:
[before 13 Feb 1869]
Source of text:
DAR 96: 70
Summary:

Asks whether JL would be prepared to sign a petition on behalf of Miss Eliza Meteyard who is seeking a civil list pension.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Lubbock, 4th baronet and 1st Baron Avebury
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
13 Feb [1869]
Source of text:
DAR 170: 72
Summary:

Down School funds.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Howard Darwin
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
14 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 210.2: 7
Summary:

Explains the point about gravitation and heat that CD does not understand in J. Croll’s letter [6218?].

Cambridge news.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
James Croll
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 Feb 1869
Source of text:
DAR 161: 264
Summary:

Thanks for abstract of Moseley’s paper on motion of glaciers [see 6599]. Reading it convinced him that Tyndall’s received view is wrong. Has formed a new view, which he has sent to Philosophical Magazine [4th ser. 37 (1869): 201–6].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project