Search: letter in document-type 
1860-1869 in date 
Bunbury, C. J. F. in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 14 of 4 items

From:
Charles James Fox Bunbury, 8th baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
30 Jan 1860
Source of text:
DAR 98 (ser. 2): 26
Summary:

On the Origin. Before expressing his disagreements, CJFB praises CD’s labour, patience, fairness, and other qualities which make the work "one of the most important that has ever appeared in Natural History". [See 2690.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles James Fox Bunbury, 8th baronet
Date:
9 Feb [1860]
Source of text:
Suffolk Record Office, Bury St Edmunds (Bunbury Family Papers E18/700/1/9/6)
Summary:

Responds to CJFB’s criticisms of the Origin [see 2669].

If CD’s theory is a satisfactory explanation of the "principles of Homology, and of Embryology, and Rudimentary organs", the difficulty in imagining the transitions between classes of beings should not weigh against the understanding it provides such large classes of facts. Defends natural selection against criticism that it is not a vera causa. Comments on "Degeneracy", extinction of intermediate forms, and the effect of theory in natural history in opening up new fields of inquiry and giving rational instead of theological explanations of facts.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles James Fox Bunbury, 8th baronet
To:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
Date:
3 Feb 1866
Source of text:
F. J. Bunbury ed. 1891–3, Later life 1: 134–6.
Summary:

Discusses Louis Agassiz’s theory of the glaciation of Brazil.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles James Fox Bunbury, 8th baronet
To:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
Date:
20 Feb 1866
Source of text:
F. J. Bunbury ed. 1891–3, Later life 1: 144–7
Summary:

Discusses CD’s and J. D. Hooker’s letters to Lyell concerning Louis Agassiz’s theory of the glaciation of the Amazon basin in Brazil.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project