Search: letter in document-type 
Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
1840-1849::1849::01 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 15 of 5 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Gabriel-Auguste (Auguste) Daubrée
Date:
[1849?]
Source of text:
Institut de France, Bibliothèque (Ms 2423 A ff. 69–70)
Summary:

Had hoped to sent specimens by carrier that day; intends to sent them next Thursday.

Thanks for German scientific newspaper: two articles interested him.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Richard Owen
Date:
[1849?]
Source of text:
Houghton Library, Harvard University (Autograph File, D)
Summary:

CD proposes to call for tea if he is well enough on Thursday.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Richard Weld
Date:
[1849]
Source of text:
Jeff Weber, Rare Books (dealer) (January 2013)
Summary:

Will return books, and asks for more.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
Date:
29 Jan [1849]
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

Has altered and added to HES’s list [compiled for Bibliographia zoologiæ et geologiæ, edited by Louis Agassiz and enlarged by HES, (1848–54)].

On zoological nomenclature CD cites a case in which he believes more harm than good would be done by following the rule of priority. Thinks the rule of the first describer’s name being attached in perpetuity to a species has been the greatest curse to natural history. Every genus of cirripedes has a half-dozen names and not one careful description.

Sends a paper he once wrote [missing] on the subject [of zoological nomenclature].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Hugh Edwin Strickland
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
31 Jan 1849
Source of text:
Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers)
Summary:

Responds to CD’s two objections to the principles involved in the "Rules of zoological nomenclature": (1) that strict enforcement of the rule of priority would cause much inconvenience, and (2) attaching name of the first describer in perpetuity puts a premium on careless description by "species mongers".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project