Search: Smith, James Edward in addressee 
1820-1829::1823::12 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 15 of 5 items

From:
William Borrer
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
8 Dec 1823
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/ADD/7, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sending Smith Weihe's "Rubi Germanici" for inspection, at suggestion of Edward Forster, and specimens of the 'Rubus' of this region. List of specimens with observations, numbered, dated 6 December 1823, including: 'R. leucostachys', 'R. fruticasus', 'R. rhamnifolius', 'R. nitidus', 'R. suberectus', 'R. corylifolius', 'R. affinis', 'R. glandulosus', 'R. caesius', and 'R. idaeus'.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Samuel Goodenough
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
11 Dec 1823
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/12/85, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sent a barrel of oysters for Smith. [Aylmer Bourke] Lambert in high spirits but Mrs [Catherine] Lambert worse than ever and never sees anyone. Smith's distinction between 'Geum' and 'Dryas' "very satisfactory" and Goodenough had not observed it before; singular generic character of 'Icosandria' so striking it makes one examine the plants carelessly.

They had a wintry summer and kept fires in all rooms as in the depth of winter, and garden produce was badly damaged: no apples, unripe pears, flavourless strawberries and raspberries, and corn very late and still green in fields on 3 November, but they produced mulberries only the third time and enjoyed a good peach harvest at the end of October. Less radicalism in his area of Cumberland. Comments on the difficulty of filling the positions of Attorney and Solicitor Generals due to the "great dearth of profound lawyers", similar to the lack of profound scholars in several of the learned professions.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Edward Forster
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
15 Dec 1823
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/ADD/27, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Recently sent Smith specimens of 'Salix glauca' and four roses, not knowing which he referred to as not a variety of '[Rosa] arvensis'. Does not know Smith's 'R. subglobosa'; thinks others of [Joseph] Woods' [(1776-1864)] varieties may rank as species; thinks he should have united two more of Smith's list, the 'R. woodsii' with 'R. dumetorum', and 'R. canna' with 'R. sarmentacea'. He has found and cultivated 'R. collina'; observations.

Discusses work of himself, [William] Borrer, and [James] Bicheno on 'Rubus', observations on 'Rubus cordifolius' and 'Rubus rhamnifolius'; will send specimens to Smith, named on authority of Merten and Weihe. Also sending plant of 'Campanuta punctata'.

Account of discussion with [Joseph] Sabine on roses.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
William Smith
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
25 Dec 1823
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/9/51, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Laments not having seen Smith for a long time, gives his reasons. Health of his family. Saw [William] Roscoe recently. [Thomas William] Coke and amenities of Holkham, [Norfolk]. [Alexander] Macleay has bought a small estate in Caithness.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Edward Forster
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
28 Dec 1823
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/4/108, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Wrote to Joseph Woods regarding 'Rosa systala' and his paper on 'Rosa' for "Linnean Transactions", transcribes part of Woods' reply. Woods explains an apparent confusion caused between 'Rosa systala' and [Nicaise Auguste] Desvaux's [(1784-1856) French botanist] 'Rosa stylosa', not having seen Desvaux's "Flore d'Anjou" at the time of his paper.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London