Search: Darwin Correspondence Project in contributor 
1870-1879::1874 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 81100 of 640 items

From:
Charles Sissmore Tomes
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[before 16 Feb 1874]
Source of text:
DAR 178: 129
Summary:

Inherited dental abnormalities in man. [Enclosed are proofs of pp. 113–16 from J. Tomes, A system of dental surgery, 2d ed. (1873).]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Albert Stratford George Canning
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 161: 40
Summary:

Offers information on pea-fowl for new edition of Variation.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
James Alexander Gammie
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 157a: 98
Summary:

Sends his observations on the fertilisation of Hedychium gardnerianum by sphinx moths. Did not look for pollen on the wing tips.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Harris
Date:
16 Feb [1874]
Source of text:
University of California Los Angeles, Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library History and Special Collections Division (Ms. 10, Letters concerning George Harris’s A Philosophical Treatise on the Nature and Constitution of Man )
Summary:

Returns proofs; has no criticisms or remarks worth sending.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henrietta Emma Darwin; Henrietta Emma Litchfield
Date:
16 Feb [1874?]
Source of text:
The John Rylands Library, The University of Manchester
Summary:

On the "doubtful & obscure" subject of marriage of cousins, CD believes, that judging from the analogy of animals, no direct evil would follow from their marriage. He would, however, expect the offspring of unrelated parents to be somewhat superior in size and vigour. The injury from the increase of any bad tendency common to the family seems to CD more to be feared than mere consanguinity; "the good effects of crossing distinct families I look at as great & undoubted".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Sissmore Tomes
Date:
16 Feb [1874]
Source of text:
Andrusier Autographs (dealer) (Spring 2013)
Summary:

Thanks for facts on inheritance

Thinks CST’s paper (C. S. Tomes 1874) about the enamel on the teeth of the armadillo is most remarkable.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Henry Baker Tristram
Date:
16 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 148: 148
Summary:

Asks HBT to sign certificate [for Royal Society] for Robert Swinhoe.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Octavius Pickard-Cambridge
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 161: 7
Summary:

Criticises sexual selection theory. Supports natural selection.

Gives CD references on proportion of sexes in spiders.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
George Edward Shuttleworth
Date:
17 Feb [1874]
Source of text:
Wellcome Collection (MS.5134)
Summary:

At the suggestion of Crichton-Browne CD writes on behalf of his son George, who is making a study of marriages between first cousins and of their offspring to determine the proportion of the latter who may be among the insane, deaf and dumb, idiotic, blind etc. Is GES willing to ask his patients [at the Royal Albert Asylum] for the information relevant to this study?

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
17 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 90: 98–9
Summary:

Gives the answers of two of the best dog breeders to CD’s queries.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Lillie Devereux Blake
Date:
18 Feb 1874
Source of text:
Blake 1888 , pp. 47–8
Summary:

Does not believe in the possibilty of dog suicide.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Albert Stratford George Canning
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 161: 41
Summary:

Reports on a female black-winged pea-fowl at his home in Ireland.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hermanus Hartogh Heijs van Zouteveen
Date:
18 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 249: 120
Summary:

Thanks for HHHvZ’s translation of Expression. CD will have HHHvZ’s notes translated by one of his sons.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Bernhard Tegetmeier
Date:
18 Feb 1874
Source of text:
Archives of the New York Botanical Garden (Charles Finney Cox Collection)
Summary:

Thanks for answering his query on greyhound puppies.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Hugo de Vries
Date:
19 Feb 1874
Source of text:
Artis Library (De Vries 1)
Summary:

Thanks for copies of HdV’s two articles on climbing plants (Vries 1873a and 1873b).

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Octavius Pickard-Cambridge
Date:
[before 20 Feb 1874]
Source of text:
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.437)
Summary:

Discusses meaning of term "sexual selection".

Comments on variability in males.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Josiah Parsons Cooke
Date:
20 Feb 1874
Source of text:
American Academy of Arts and Sciences (Letterbook 07-36)
Summary:

Thanks for his election as Foreign Honorary Member.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Karl Ludwig (Ludwig) Rütimeyer
Date:
20 Feb 1874
Source of text:
Universitätsbibliothek Basel, Handschriften (G IV 91, 6)
Summary:

Thanks for LR’s essay on living and fossil turtles [Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Neuchâtel 9 (1873): 439–41].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Nettleship Staley
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
20 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 89: 191–4
Summary:

General observations on the native Hawaiian population.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
George Cupples
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 Feb 1874
Source of text:
DAR 90: 91–2, 94–7, 102–13, 117–19; DAR 161: 301
Summary:

Answers to queries are being sent.

Enclosure 1: statistics on puppies bred by Rayner in 1873.

Enclosure 2 from W. N. Massey: number of males or females raised depends entirely on preference of greyhound breeders.

Enclosure 3 from E. L. Williams: breeders prefer to destroy bitch pups.

Enclosure 4: Thomas Morse answers CD’s three queries, transmitted by GC: (1) in deerhounds, females predominate, three to one; (2) in all but cattle, females are less worth preserving; (3) TM rears all the young.

Enclosure 5: John Wright responds to CD’s queries about proportion of sexes in births of horses, cattle, and dogs.

Enclosure 6: G. W. Hickman cannot give reliable answers to CD’s queries on proportion of sexes born [in greyhounds?].

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project