Search: Herschel, John in correspondent 
Maclear, Thomas in addressee 
1830-1839::1836 in date 
Sorted by:

Showing 2136 of 36 items

From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
4] June [1836
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Thanks TM for restoring JH's micrometer.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
[1836-7?]
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Believes that JH and TM can compile a better comet catalog together than they could separately.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
[19 July 1836]
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Notes a discrepancy in TM's latest observations and those of Thomas Brisbane.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
25] July [1836
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Congratulates TM on the birth of his son, George.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
22] August [1836
Source of text:
RS:HS 21.215
Summary:

A note along with a request from Niccolo Cacciatore for some observations that JH says he cannot make.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
[26 August 1836]
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Inquires about a star not found in TM's list of comet stars. Believes that their comet collaboration is going well.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
3] September [1836
Source of text:
RS:HS 21.209
Summary:

Sends formulae for dealing with the apparent differences, in viewing the comet and compared star, due to the effects of parallax and refraction.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
8] September [1836
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Discusses their table of comet stars.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
10] September [1836
Source of text:
RS:HS 12.237
Summary:

Much obliged for F. W. Bessel's zone. Thinks his own extra meridian observations of the comet will be respectable. Feels sure Fearon Fallows could not have approved of the supports of the dome. Has been promised the pleasure of inspecting the expenses of the Observatory. Captain J. E. Alexander and Dr. John Murray will call this morning for a parting cup of tea.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
[19 September 1836]
Source of text:
RS:HS 21.210
Summary:

Calms TM about not having his comet observations published yet; those published so far are not of much value.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
28] September [1836
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Wants to reset his barometer by TM's.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
[1836-10]
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Asks for TM's barometer and thermometer readings for 20-28 September.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
12] October [1836
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Compares JH's and TM's barometric readings. Criticizes Pierre Morin's work.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
[13 October 1836]
Source of text:
RS:HS 12.95 (C: RS:HS 21.212)
Summary:

Reports on JH's actinometer observations. Explains why he subscribed to 'Col. [Harry] Smith's piece of plate.'

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
[17 December 1836]
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Setting a unit of measurement for solar radiation (the 'actine'); proposes to 'take for a unit of solar heat that which if all employed in heating a cubic inch of water exposing a horizontal surface of one square inch, to a vertical Sun during one minute would produce a dilation of one thousandth part of its volume.'

Contributor:
John Herschel Project
From:
Sir John Herschel
To:
Thomas Maclear
Date:
20] December [1836
Source of text:
unknown
Summary:

Testing whether an actinometer with a glass back is more accurate than one without.

Contributor:
John Herschel Project