Regarding the position of Mr. Wilson at Nantes [see JH's 1831-10-27].
Regarding the position of Mr. Wilson at Nantes [see JH's 1831-10-27].
Is grateful for JH's approbation. Includes another of his works for his perusal.
Encloses the proof of the first part of his paper, with queries. Regarding the seal used. Volume of the memoirs have been published. There are important matters for the next Astronomical Council.
Family news, and congratulations to JH on his knighthood.
Congratulates JH on his knighthood.
Asks that in JD's lectures at King's College, London, he remove an unfair and incorrect reference to JH.
In an article commenting on a pamphlet about the alleged decline of science in England, JH's name has frequently been taken in vain. JH writes to protest.
Wants to ensure that a letter of JH's on the decline of science controversy is to be published in Brewster's journal.
Regrets exceedingly that JH should think he was referring to him in his lecture. Regrets his work on Sound has been dragged into the controversy.
No summary available.
Sir James Macken wishes the Herschels to come to dinner. Hopes they will attend.
Has received JH's communication. Asks that JH not write JS unless he can write in a 'different manner.'
Congratulations on his knighthood. Regrets they were unable to call on the Herschels. Would JH like to become a candidate for the Literary Society?
Surprised at JS's response [see 1831-11-28] to his offer. Because the offer was well intentioned, repeats it and hopes that their mutual interests will lead to continued correspondence.
Thanks JD for his letter [see JD's 1831-11-26].
Wants 100 of JH's star forms. Wants any information on a collection of observations of Venus.
Regrets the tensions that arose between JH and JS. Congratulates JH on his knighthood. Laments the costs and difficulties involved in the construction of JS's new observatory.