Search: Whitelegge, Thomas in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 18 of 8 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Whitelegge
Date:
28 Apr 1878
Source of text:
Mitchell Library, Sydney (MLMSS 5833)
Summary:

Has not studied Geum, but suppression of one sex is not rare in plants.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Whitelegge
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
16 May 1878
Source of text:
DAR 181: 92
Summary:

Gynodioecism in Ranunculus acris.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Whitelegge
Date:
17 May 1878
Source of text:
Mitchell Library, Sydney (MLMSS 5833)
Summary:

Will use TW’s case of gynodioecious Ranunculus if he prints a new edition of Forms of flowers.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Whitelegge
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
21 May 1878
Source of text:
DAR 181: 93
Summary:

Gynodioecism.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Whitelegge
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
27 May 1878
Source of text:
DAR 181: 94
Summary:

Has found a few examples of Ranunculus repens with stamens reduced as in R. acris.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Thomas Whitelegge
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
15 July 1878
Source of text:
DAR 181: 95
Summary:

Has found examples of small female flowers in Stachys germanica and Ranunculus bulbosus.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Thomas Whitelegge
Date:
16 July 1878
Source of text:
Mitchell Library, Sydney (MLMSS 5833)
Summary:

Asks TW not to send more information as CD does not expect a new edition of Forms of flowers.

TW’s Stachys case is what he calls gynodioeciousness.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Ferdinand von Mueller
To:
Thomas Whitelegge
Date:
3 November 1886
Source of text:
National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller Project