Search: 1800-1809 in date 
Banks, Joseph in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 6180 of 87 items

From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Samuel Tyssen
Date:
26 April 1805
Source of text:
MM/6/20, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Samuel Tyssen
Date:
26 May 1805
Source of text:
MM/6/21, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
3 June 1805
Source of text:
MM/8/65, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Matthew Flinders
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
19 August 1805
Source of text:
L&P/12/127, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Samuel Tyssen
Date:
8 September 1805
Source of text:
MM/6/22, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Samuel Tyssen
Date:
17 September 1805
Source of text:
MM/6/23, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Samuel Tyssen
Date:
21 September 1805
Source of text:
MM/6/24, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Edward Home
Date:
22 October 1805
Source of text:
MM/6/26, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Thomas Andrew Knight
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
22 November 1805
Source of text:
L&P/12/121, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
William Herschel
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
8 December 1805
Source of text:
L&P/12/117, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Thomas Andrew Knight
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
1806
Source of text:
L&P/12/132, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
James Robertson
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
1806
Source of text:
L&P/12/137, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Sir Joseph Banks
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
20 Jan 1806
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/77, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Urges Smith to reread his last letter [not extant] where Smith will find that Banks did not draw parallels between Smith and [Richard] Salisbury. Had Banks known how deep the quarrel between Smith and Salisbury had become he would never have undertaken the "hopeless task" of effecting a reconciliation, and now relinquishes it. Refers Smith to his advice in last letter, viz to refrain from personal altercations but by no means avoid potential discussion. Remarks that whilst he does not "feel the esteem for Salisbury [he] once did" he does not "despise his indefatigable industry".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
James Smithson
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
3 March 1806
Source of text:
L&P/12/128, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
Joseph Banks
Date:
7 April 1806
Source of text:
MM/6/37, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
George Thomas Staunton
Date:
24 January 1807
Source of text:
MM/6/8, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Joseph Banks
To:
George Thomas Staunton
Date:
March 1807
Source of text:
MM/6/28, Royal Society
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Royal Society
From:
Sir Joseph Banks
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Sep 1807
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/78, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Unable to give Mr Patterson any information regarding the state of George III's flock of merino sheep. Had recommended to the King [George III (1738-1820)] for a ram to be sold for 25 guineas, a "fine wooled sheep". The King's flock of the negretti strain of Spain, "finer than the original flock". One ram castrated this year because of a few "king hairs" in his wool but has not had one other sheep that did not pass the judgement of the wool-stapler, who annually examines each sheep.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir Joseph Banks
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
8 Dec 1807
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/79, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Friendly criticism of Smith's book; wonders whether he relied too much on [Erasmus] Darwin who was "too poetical to be correct" and [William] Forsyth who was "too cunning" to be quite so pure as Smith supposes him. Pleased to hear that the second fasiculum of "Flora Graeca" is to be printed soon. Genus 'Silene' has always been obscure and remarks on this subject will be welcome.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Sir Joseph Banks
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
15 Dec 1807
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/1/80, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Assures Smith that he does not think ill of him if they differ in opinion. Relates a series of experiments with peach, cherry and pear trees for investigating [William] Forsyth's claim for regenerating old trees with his "plaster", at the request of George III. Asks whether in the Norfolk dialect a turkey's nest is called her "rip".

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London