Search: 1810-1819 in date 
Forster, Edward in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 13 of 3 items

From:
Edward Forster
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
7 Mar 1810
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/10, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Sends parcel from [George] Don. Error with Smith's new species 'Hieracium prenanthoides' in "English botany", confusion with 'H. denticulatum'; discusses in detail.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Edward Forster
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
27 Aug 1811
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/4/107, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Requests specimen of foliage of 'Ulmus campestris', following Benjamin [Meggot Forster's] sending him Dutch elm, believes may be Willdenow's 'Ulmus suberosa' and remarks that Smith's 'Ulmus suberosa' and 'Ulmus gabra' are often the same. Asks to delay publication of the 'Scrophularia' he sent [James] Sowerby as it was not wild, intends to send new specimen. Asks for specimen of 'Salix glauca'. Postscript that Lord Moira believes it impossible for the Prince Regent to be anything but a patron.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London
From:
Edward Forster
To:
Sir James Edward Smith
Date:
24 Sep 1811
Source of text:
GB-110/JES/COR/22/11, The Linnean Society of London
Summary:

Received roots and specimens of Smith's Norfolk elm, which he thinks comes closer to 'glabra'; can get naturalised Dutch elm for "English botany". Believes Lord Moira [Francis Edward Rawdon-Hastings, 1st Marquess of Hastings (1754-1826)] will not be troublesome concerning the Prince Regent, as he has already agreed to become Linnean Society patron. Benjamin [Forster] adamant that he did not criticise "Flora Britannica"; only lamented delay of fourth volume.

Contributor:
The Linnean Society of London