C. C. Babington agrees with JDH that botanists tend to note varieties more in large genera than in very small ones.

Heartened that tabulations of small and large genera done in different ways yield good results. JDH has done some tabulations but has not followed CD’s method of getting equal numbers of small and large genera.

JDH’s "objection" that small local genera do not vary and mundane ones do, is exactly CD’s point. Local floras useful to test idea that varieties are incipient species. Same genus in different countries cannot be lumped.

Summary of JDH’s objections to CD’s survey of floras and conclusion that large genera vary more than small.

Thanks JDH for his objections; will respond by sending fair copy of MS when written.

Continued objections to methods and conclusions of CD’s survey.

No summary available.

Writing section on large and small genera [for Natural selection, ch. 4].

Huxley supersedes Owen on parthenogenesis.

Buckle’s History of civilisation in England extremely interesting.