Search: 1850-1859::1858 in date 
letter in document-type 
Cambridge University Library in repository 
Sorted by:

Showing 2140 of 158 items

From:
Hewett Cottrell Watson
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
23 Feb [1858]
Source of text:
DAR 98: A21–2
Summary:

Believes that botanists tend to mark more varieties in large than in small genera, but notes that where many varieties of a species exist these varieties may well be passed over, whereas similar varieties of another species which are fewer in number may well be recorded.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[25] Feb 1858
Source of text:
DAR 100: 115a–d
Summary:

Botanical practice can confuse CD’s compilations. Many small genera would have been species had the whole natural order [family] been known.

JDH’s low opinion of Buckle;

high opinion of Mrs Farrer.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Frederick Smith
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
26 Feb 1858
Source of text:
DAR 177: 191 (fragile)
Summary:

Identifies an ant described by CD and discusses the predatory habits of Formica sanguinea.

Describes some wasps’ nests.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
27 [Feb 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 210.6: 23
Summary:

CD intends to enter WED at Christ’s College.

Thanks him for inquiries made about horses.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
28 Feb [1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 225
Summary:

JDH has confirmed CD’s opinion on the affinities of species in great genera. Is looking at large genera in several local Floras to find the "range & commonness of varying species".

Has been "beyond measure interested" in the construction instincts of the hive-bee.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Thomas Mayo Brewer
To:
Augustus Addison Gould
Date:
[Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 160: 305, 305/1, 305/2
Summary:

Writes regarding CD’s query on yellow-billed cuckoo and the laying of eggs in other birds’ nests.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Cardale Babington
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
3 Mar 1858
Source of text:
DAR 98: A146–7
Summary:

States his belief that there is a tendency to note varieties in the larger genera rather than in the very small ones.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Charles Cardale Babington
Date:
4 Mar [1858]
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library (MS Add.8182: 21)
Summary:

Notes views of Hooker and George Bentham on monotypic forms.

Has tabulated several floras and finds that large genera show preponderance in numbers of varieties. Now sees his results are quite worthless.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Richard Owen
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
4 March 1858
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 236
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
5 [Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 226
Summary:

C. C. Babington agrees with JDH that botanists tend to note varieties more in large genera than in very small ones.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Frederick Smith
Date:
[before 9 Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR Pamphlet collection (bound with Smith, Frederick (a) 1854)
Summary:

Four queries regarding the habits of bees and ants with answers by FS interlined between each query.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
John Phillips
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
9 March 1858
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 255
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
10 [Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 227
Summary:

Heartened that tabulations of small and large genera done in different ways yield good results. JDH has done some tabulations but has not followed CD’s method of getting equal numbers of small and large genera.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Text Online
From:
Darwin, Emma
To:
Darwin, W. E.
Date:
[11? March 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 219.1: 18
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Darwin Family Letters
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
11 Mar [1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 228
Summary:

JDH’s "objection" that small local genera do not vary and mundane ones do, is exactly CD’s point. Local floras useful to test idea that varieties are incipient species. Same genus in different countries cannot be lumped.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Text Online
From:
Henry Philpott
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
11 March 1858
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 259
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[14 Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 104: 182–5
Summary:

Summary of JDH’s objections to CD’s survey of floras and conclusion that large genera vary more than small.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
Text Online
From:
Henry Philpott
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
15 March 1858
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 260
Summary:

No summary available.

Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
16 [Mar 1858]
Source of text:
DAR 114: 229
Summary:

Thanks JDH for his objections; will respond by sending fair copy of MS when written.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
18 Mar 1858
Source of text:
DAR 100: 115e–f
Summary:

Continued objections to methods and conclusions of CD’s survey.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail