Search: 1860-1869 in date 
Darwin, C. R. in correspondent 
Henslow, J. S. in correspondent 
Sorted by:

Showing 114 of 14 items

From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
29 Jan [1860]
Source of text:
RR Auction (dealers) (8 December 2021, lot 119)
Summary:

Measles has ben running through the house, but they are now quit of it.

Discusses plans for JSH to visit; eager to discuss Origin.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
3 Feb [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A62
Summary:

Thanks for L. Jenyns’ very sensible letter [missing].

Will be delighted to see JSH whenever he can come.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
9 Feb [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A63–4
Summary:

Sends directions for JSH’s journey to Bromley and Down.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
2 Apr [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A65–6
Summary:

Reminds JSH to send "sketch & account of the wasp’s comb in transitional state from horizontal to vertical, & the country whence procured".

Asks for information on spread of Anacharis [Elodea].

Sedgwick [in criticism of Origin] was not very fair, but Murray says it is splendid for selling copies to "the unfortunate students".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
John Stevens Henslow
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
7 Apr 1860
Source of text:
DAR 166.1:180 [diagram here]
Summary:

Sketch and description of a [wasp’s] nest from Cuba. [Notes by CD on wasps’ nests and comb-building habits of hive-bees.]

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
John Stevens Henslow
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
5 May 1860
Source of text:
DAR 186: 47
Summary:

Reports to CD on what he has found out about Elodea growing near Cambridge.

Sedgwick is speaking at [Cambridge] Philosophical Society on CD’s "supposed errors" [Camb. Herald & Huntingdonshire Gaz. 19 May 1860, pp. 3–4].

JSH wonders how Owen can be so savage toward CD’s views when his own are "to a certain extent of the same character".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
8 May [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A67–9
Summary:

Comments on Richard Owen’s review of the Origin [in Edinburgh Rev. 111 (1860): 487–532]. Considers Owen unfair to CD and most ungenerous toward Hooker.

Expects Sedgwick to be fierce against him. Sedgwick also misrepresented CD in his Spectator review [24 Mar and 7 Apr 1860].

Compares natural selection to the undulatory theory of light as a hypothesis explaining a large number of facts.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
14 May [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A70–1
Summary:

Thanks JSH for his defence [see 2794].

He is not hurt for long by what his attackers say. His conclusions were arrived at after long study. He has certainly erred, but not so much as "Sedgwick and Co." think.

Asks JSH to send names of plants that vary greatly in length of pistil.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
17 May [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A72–3, A116
Summary:

Sends characters by which he can divide all primroses and cowslips into what he suspects will be male and female plants. Believes these forms are first step in formation of a dioecious plant.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
16 July [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A74–5
Summary:

Discusses Charles Daubeny’s views on sexuality of plants [Rep. BAAS 30 (1860) pt 2: 109–10]. "There is no greater mystery in the whole world, as it seems to me, than the existence of sexes, – more especially since the discovery of Parthenogenesis."

Says apropos of the FitzRoy Bible incident [at Oxford BAAS meeting], "I think his mind is often on verge of insanity."

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
28 [Sept 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A76–8
Summary:

Has been observing Drosera. Asks JSH whether a curious motion in the red fluid poured out from the viscid hairs is a known or common phenomenon. It surprised him, but he is "so ignorant of vegetable physiology".

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
11 Oct [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A79–80
Summary:

Sends further details on the movement of the red fluid substance in Drosera. Will write a paper on it.

"Dr [C. R.] Bree ""pitches"" into me handsomely."

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
26 Oct [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A81–2
Summary:

CD does not mind C. R. Bree’s dull, unvarying abuse and misrepresentation, but when he doubts CD’s deliberate word, "that is the act of a man who has not the soul of a gentleman in him".

JSH’s letter in Athenæum ["Flints in the drift", 20 Oct. 1860, p. 516] is interesting.

H. Freke’s paper [On the origin of species by means of organic affinity (1861)] is beyond CD’s scope.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
John Stevens Henslow
Date:
10 Nov [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 93: A83–4
Summary:

The stone hatchets are a great muddle. Would like a copy of Jacques Boucher [de Crèvecoeur] de Perthes’s book [Antiquités Celtiques et antédiluviennes (1847–64)].

Is studying action of carbonate of ammonia on Drosera. Asks if this has been done.

Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
thumbnail