JL’s book [Prehistoric times (1865)] is "most original".
Wishes him success in politics.
Showing 61–80 of 96 items
JL’s book [Prehistoric times (1865)] is "most original".
Wishes him success in politics.
Delighted at CD’s praise of his book [Prehistoric times (1865)].
Returns [Fritz?] Müller’s work [probably Für Darwin (1864)]. It is a remarkable memoir.
Has read abstract of JL’s paper ["On the present state of archaeological science", Athenæum 21 July 1866, pp. 79–82] and praises it.
Returns Primula paper [Collected papers 2: 45–63].
Anxious to make acquaintance of Ernst Haeckel [who was staying with CD].
Asks JL to look up a paper by Thomas Hincks on Polyzoa or Bryozoa [Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 2d ser. 1 (1861): 278–81].
JL’s brother-in-law [Robert Birkbeck] would like a note of introduction to John Murray.
Encloses note of introduction to Murray.
H. T. Stainton should be elected F.R.S.
Discusses the practice of exogamy; asks if any animals have an instinctive repugnance to inbreeding.
Close inbreeding and factors acting against it.
Thanks CD for information.
Returns R. G. Haliburton’s paper ["The unity of the human race proved by the universality of certain superstitions connected with sneezing", reprinted in New materials for the history of man (1863)] and sends one of his own partly in answer to it ["The early condition of man", Anthropol. Rev. 6 (1868): 1–14].
Capital BAAS meeting at Dundee.
Wants information on Fuegian harpoons. Must prepare second edition of Prehistoric times.
Introduction of humble-bees into Australia.
Many thanks for the book [Variation].
Discusses [Fritz?] Müller’s confusion about ova and pseudova; JL’s Daphnia paper [Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 147 (1857): 79–100; see 1979] first demonstrated their structural identity.
Points out a misleading statement in Variation.
Returns Anthropological Review.
Asks to borrow Desmarest on Crustacea [Considérations générales sur la classe des crustacés (1825)].
Has been reading JL’s address to the Entomological Society [Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 3d. ser. 5 (1865–7): cxiii–cxxxi].
Would like to hear JL’s conclusion for or against Pangenesis.
Found [Variation] full of interest. Has not yet made up his mind about Pangenesis; wants to hear what can be said against it.