Text Online
From:
John Evans
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
10 February 1860
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 147 & 147(ii)
Summary:
No summary available.
Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Philip Lutley Sclater
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
11 Feb 1860
Source of text:
DAR 205.3: 290, DAR 205.7: 143
Summary:
Informs CD that Sylvicola aureola may be a distinct species but is a close ally of S. aestiva of N. and S. America and perhaps only a "climatic variety".
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Lyell, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[13–14 Feb 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 205.3: 283, DAR 205.9: 395
Summary:
Discusses phases of climate.
Describes fossil mammals discovered by Auguste Bravard in South America.
Has had argument with Bishop of Oxford [Samuel Wilberforce] about CD’s book [Origin].
Discusses review in Annals and Magazine of Natural History. Guesses that T. V. Wollaston is the author.
Discusses evidence of shells on Madeira.
Comments on paper by Wallace ["On the zoological geography of the Malay Archipelago", J. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Zool.) 4 (1860): 172–84].
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
14 Feb [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 40
Summary:
Huxley’s Royal Institution lecture on Origin [10 Feb 1860, Not. Proc. R. Inst. G. B. 3 (1858–62): 195–200] an "entire failure" as an exposition of CD’s doctrine.
R. I. Murchison very civil.
CD counts Lyell among the converted.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
George Henry Kendrick Thwaites
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[14 Feb 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 205.4: 100
Summary:
Questions how natural selection can explain why some cells remain simple and others are modified into highly complex structures.
Reports on the spread in Ceylon of a recently introduced plant.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Neil Arnott
Date:
16 Feb [1860?]
Source of text:
DAR 143: 22
Summary:
Discusses NA’s pamphlet on human progress. Suggests making it a book [A survey of human progress (1861)].
Comments on study of dead languages.
Denies that animals are "governed only by selfish motives".
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Darwin, Emma
To:
Darwin, W. E.
Date:
[16 February 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 210.6: 54
Summary:
No summary available.
Contributor:
Darwin Family Letters
Text Online
From:
Darwin, Horace
To:
Darwin, Leonard
Date:
17 February 1860
Source of text:
DAR 258: 885
Summary:
No summary available.
Contributor:
Darwin Family Letters
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
[20 Feb 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 41
Summary:
Comments on W. H. Harvey’s article on a monstrous Begonia [Gard. Chron. 18 Feb 1860].
Is astonished at being attacked for not allowing great and abrupt variations under nature. More evidence needed to make CD admit that forms have often changed "by saltum".
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
[23 Feb 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 42
Summary:
Too ill to go to club.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
James Lamont, 1st baronet
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
[23 Feb 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 47: 150–1
Summary:
Believes the British and Norwegian species of red grouse are merely strongly marked varieties of the same species.
Writes of the effect of importing a few brace of a wilder breed of grouse into Argyleshire and of their change in territory since 1846.
His explanation of game becoming "wilder": he thinks it is due to a difference in their enemies – man replacing hawks leads to flight replacing cowering.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Andrew Crombie Ramsay
Date:
23 Feb [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 261.9: 2 (EH 88205975)
Summary:
Pleased ACR likes Origin. Every geological believer is most important. A long, stiff battle is ahead for the new doctrine.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
26 [Feb 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 43
Summary:
Applauds JDH’s reply [25 Feb 1860] to W. H. Harvey in Gardeners’ Chronicle.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
[26 Feb or 4 Mar] 1860
Source of text:
DAR 115: 44
Summary:
Asks JDH for some Goodenia.
Suggests Daniel Oliver try to cross Mimosa, noted for sterility.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Francis Boott
To:
Charles Robert Darwin
Date:
29 Feb 1860
Source of text:
DAR 98 (ser. 2): 27–8
Summary:
Returns paper by Asa Gray [? "Review of Darwin’s theory", Am. J. Sci. 2d ser. 29 (1860): 153–84].
Greatly admires Origin.
Can follow effects of natural selection in Carex, but when CD brings millions of years into play, he is like Church which demands faith. FB cannot believe in divinity of Christ, resurrection, or miracles.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
W. B. Carpenter
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
29 February 1860
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 75
Summary:
No summary available.
Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
Text Online
From:
Leonard Jenyns
To:
J. S. Henslow
Date:
March 1860
Source of text:
Cambridge University Library MS Add. 8177: 199
Summary:
No summary available.
Contributor:
Henslow Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:
3 Mar [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 115: 45
Summary:
CD’s list of fifteen converts. His opinions on opponents and supporters.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
William Erasmus Darwin
Date:
[4 Mar 1860]
Source of text:
DAR 210.6: 55
Summary:
Discusses the direction of WED’s studies.
Tells of the response to the Origin and the impact that it has made in England and abroad.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
From:
Charles Robert Darwin
To:
James Lamont, 1st baronet
Date:
5 Mar [1860]
Source of text:
DAR 146: 28
Summary:
Responds to JL’s comments on effect of natural selection on grouse or reindeer.
Asks if dirt adheres to feet of water-birds.
Contributor:
Darwin Correspondence Project
Document type
Repository
- Cambridge University Library
- Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond12
- American Philosophical Society5
- Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives, Imperial College5
- Natural History Museum and Archives3
- The British Library3
- English Heritage, Down House, Downe2
- Field Museum of Natural History2
- Karpeles Manuscript Library Museums2
- Linnean Society of London2
- Sotheby's (dealers)2
- Taylor Library, Shrewsbury School2
- Archives of the New York Botanical Garden1
- Christie’s (dealers)1
- Cleveland Health Sciences Library, Case Western Reserve University1
- Cliffe Castle Museum, Bradford Museums and Galleries Geology Collections, Keighley1
- Duke University, Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library1
- Ernst-Haeckel-Haus, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität1
- Geological Society of London1
- Houghton Library, Harvard University1
- John Murray Archive, National Library of Scotland1
- Legends (dealers)1
- National Library of Scotland1
- Royal College of Physicians of London1
- Smithsonian Libraries1
- Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz1
- The Argyll Papers, Inveraray1
- The University of Edinburgh Centre for Research Collections1